Legislative update from Rep. Pam Curtis

Opinion column

Rep. Pam Curtis

by State Rep. Pam Curtis, D-32nd Dist.

In Week 3 of the Kansas Legislative Session, #AxeTheFoodTax legislation continues to move through the legislative process and a controversial redistricting map, “Ad Astra 2,” was passed out after much debate and pushback from House Democrats and a few Republicans. The Clean Slate Bill was introduced in House Judiciary. Finally, the week closed out with a hearing on a bill to protect the state reptile: the ornate box turtle.

Be sure to answer my 2022 Legislative Survey. We will soon be voting on many of these questions, and I want to know your feelings on the most important legislation before I cast my vote. Your opinion matters to me. The survey only takes a few moments to answer.

AxeTheFoodTax gets a hearing

The House Democrats’ food tax cut bill, HB 2487, received a hearing on Tuesday, Jan. 25. The bill cuts the state sales tax on food to 0% from 6.5%. The tax has been in place since the 1930s and raised 10 times, most recently under former Gov. Sam Brownback. If the bill passes, the average Kansas family will save $500 per year.

Last year, the Legislature again cut corporate taxes. Now it is time for hardworking families to see tax relief.

House Republicans pass gerrymandered map “Ad Astra 2”

On Wednesday, Jan. 26, the “Ad Astra 2” map passed the House on a 79-37 vote one day after a four-hour debate. Now the map is in Gov. Kelly’s hands.

All House Democrats opposed the map. From the date of introduction to passage was only five days, leaving little time for the public to study the map and submit feedback to the committee. Considering the promises from Republican leadership of “unprecedented transparency,” this was a disappointing timeline.

Ad Astra 2 places Lawrence into the Big First, a heavily rural district with stark differences in economy, geography, socioeconomic status, racial makeup, and partisanship, among other demographics. Lawrence was carved with meticulous attention out of Douglas County — no other parts of Douglas were moved. It is noteworthy that of the 650+ pieces of testimony received throughout the redistricting process, not a single member of the public called for Lawrence to join the 1st Congressional District. Many of us saw this as a textbook example of gerrymandering.

The map also contradicts public input regarding the 3rd Congressional District. Hundreds of Kansans demanded the metro cores of Wyandotte and Johnson county stay intact; despite this clear plea, House Republicans hacked the counties in half.

A line was drawn through Wyandotte County to carve up neighborhoods – generally following I-70 dividing the county north/south. The boundaries divide the community along racial lines, another clear-cut example of prohibited gerrymandering.

During the floor debate, I spoke strongly against the maps that divide Wyandotte County.

The efforts to divide Wyandotte County into two congressional districts in the redistricting process are very disappointing. The map that passed divides Wyandotte County roughly along I-70 placing the north part of the county in the 2nd Congressional District and the southern part in the 3rd Congressional District. An additional map that was offered divided Wyandotte County east-west roughly along 65th Street.

It is wrong to divide Wyandotte County. If we cannot agree on a map that keeps the core of the KC Metro area in the same congressional district, then it would be better to keep Wyandotte County whole in the same congressional district rather than divide the county into two.

Clean slate legislation

The House Judiciary Committee accepted my request, and the “Clean Slate” bill has been introduced. The bill was drafted based on the recommendations of the Kansas Judicial Council, Criminal Law Advisory Committee. It will provide for an automated process for sealing of criminal records from public view, referred to as expungement.

Other states have adopted various measures of Clean Slate legislation to help remove barriers for returning citizens.

Clean Slate legislation will help thousands of Kansans who are eligible for expungement however lack the time and resources to get their record expunged manually.

Expungement removes a barrier to opportunity and gives people with criminal records a chance to move on with their lives and get back to work once they have paid their debt to society. There is growing support among the business community for Clean Slate legislation and as they adopt and participate in second chance hiring policies.

‘Save the Turtles’: The Ornate Box Turtle

A bill to prohibit the unlawful collection or possession of the ornate box turtle had a hearing on Thursday, Jan. 27, in the Agriculture committee. Kansas designated the ornate box turtle the official state reptile in 1986. “Save the turtles” could be heard passing through the halls after the committee adjourned.

Happy Kansas Day!

Kansas Day was Saturday, Jan. 29. There were events across the state to celebrate the great state of Kansas.

On Wednesday, local government officials visited Topeka for Local Government Day. It is always a pleasure to visit with local officials from Wyandotte County and around Kansas. This provides an opportunity for us to meet and discuss matters before the Kansas Legislature. And it is always good to see people from home. The time they take to come to Topeka is very much appreciated.

Please take the 2022 Legislature Survey if you haven’t already. We will soon be voting on these important issues in the Legislature, and your opinion matters to me. The survey is at https://www.curtisforkck.com/2022survey.

It is a special honor to serve as your state representative. I value and appreciate your input on issues facing state government. Please feel free to contact me with your comments and questions.

My office address is Room 452-S, 300 SW 10th, Topeka, KS 66612. You can reach me at 785-296-7430 or call the legislative hotline at 1-800-432-3924 to leave a message for me. You can also email me at [email protected].

Kansas House panel pokes holes in expedited megaproject incentive bill during initial review

by Noah Taborda, Kansas Reflector

Topeka — Kansas House members dissecting a financial incentive package to encourage manufacturers to pursue multi-billion-dollar investments in the state lamented the rushed nature of the legislation as they considered what guardrails were necessary to include.

Senate Bill 347 provides companies planning to invest at least $1 billion in Kansas over five years with several special incentives. The package is a response to a request front the Kelly administration to adopt a measure that would improve the state’s bid for an unnamed company expected to invest $4 billion in a production plant.

Amendments added in the Senate would reduce the state corporate income tax rate of 4% by 0.5% each year project funds are sent to these companies, make a tax credit non-refundable and establish a sunset of June 30, 2023. Paul Hughes, deputy secretary for the Kansas Department of Commerce, said the sunset was far too soon and asked for that date to be pushed back to 2027.

“A one-year sunset sends the wrong message to the business community,” Hughes told legislators Monday. “Kansas needs to be in the game for these megaprojects, especially during a time when the number of megaprojects seeking new locations is high. We must capitalize on this moment.”

The Senate approved the bill last week by a vote of 32 to 7, sending it to the House Commerce, Labor, and Economic Development Committee for consideration. On the first of three planned days to work through the bill, several members of the House panel expressed concerns with the speed the bill was moving despite apparent issues.

For example, Rep. Blaine Finch, R-Ottawa, found an issue with the wording of a provision providing 50% state property tax abatement for these companies.

“This says they shall be exempt for 50%,” Finch said. “If the local government only wants to give a 25% ad valorem property tax abatement, this bill says they can’t do that. So, you are preempting local authority, correct?”

“That is not the intent,” Hughes said.

“It probably needs to be revised then,” Finch said.

Finch was not the only legislator to find issues within the legislation. While some legislators agreed the sunset would dissuade companies, Rep. Sean Tarwater, a Stilwell Republican and chairman of the House commerce panel, said the sunset was a key to ensuring there were not more slip-ups that haven’t been exposed.

“If we can get one or two companies in with the sunset, we can then kind of moderate it and see how it’s going and make sure that we don’t bankrupt the state by trying to get people to move here or have to raise taxes,” Tarwater said.

Chamber of commerce representatives from across the state testified in support of the measure.

Rep. Rui Xu, D-Westwood, said he was excited about the potential to attract business but struggled with the potential unintended consequences.

“I generally believe this could be a transformative investment into Kansas and materially change how the state is viewed in the larger scheme of things, but that’s if we get it right,” Xu said. “There are lots of scenarios where that doesn’t happen.”

Kansas Reflector stories, www.kansasreflector.com, may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.


See more at https://kansasreflector.com/2022/02/01/kansas-house-panel-pokes-holes-in-expedited-megaproject-incentive-bill-during-initial-review/

Kansas lawmakers rebrand complaints with public education in push for ‘school choice’

House panel provides platform for two parents’ objections to themes of LGBTQ tolerance, implicit bias, white privilege

David Smith, right, spokesman for Shawnee Mission School District, and Mark McCormick, spokesman for ACLU of Kansas, appeared Jan. 24, 2022, before the House K-12 Education Committee for a discussion on “critical pedagogy.” (Photo by Sherman Smith, Kansas Reflector)

by Sherman Smith and Tim Carpenter, Kansas Reflector

Topeka — Lawmakers in the Kansas House began laying the groundwork last week for redirecting taxpayer money from public to private schools by holding a two-hour hearing on complaints two parents have with diversity and inclusion initiatives.

Rep. Kristey Williams, R-Augusta, organized the discussion on “critical pedagogy” as a rebranding of critical race theory, although the parents and members of her K-12 Education Budget Committee continued to invoke CRT as the anti-American “religion” lurking behind staff training and curriculum in schools.

Rep. Patrick Penn, R-Wichita, introduced familiar legislation at the start of the hearing that would allow parents to pull their share of state aid out of a public school and into a savings account, where the money can be applied to private school tuition. Williams scheduled a hearing on House Bill 2550 for Tuesday.

In an interview last week with Americans for Prosperity, Williams outlined goals for her committee. They include installing a parental bill of rights, to make sure parents know what their children are being taught in school, and providing “school choice,” a reference to using taxpayers dollars for private schools.

“We do want the money to follow the student,” Williams said. “If the student succeeds, Kansas succeeds, our communities succeed, our families succeed. It’s a win-win.”

The conversation on critical pedagogy pitted David Smith, spokesman for Shawnee Mission School District, and Mark McCormick, spokesman for ACLU of Kansas, against Denise Roberts, who removed her children from Shawnee Mission schools, and Tamara Seyler-James, a parent in the Blue Valley School District.

The two white parents objected to themes of LGBTQ tolerance, implicit bias, white privilege and white fragility. There was no indication from William that parents of Black or LGBTQ students would be able to air their grievances before the Legislature.

“They purport to teach my child about implicit bias, and then drive the conversation exclusively toward the topic of whites behaving badly, as opposed to balancing the equation and stating that everybody, no matter their skin color, is human, and is flawed and could commit the sin of bias and racism,” Seyler-James said. “I find that problematic.”

McCormick objected to remarks Williams made in a hearing last year in which she connected critical race theory to teachings that cause white children to feel shame.

Williams denied that she ever said “pedagogy saddles white children with the sins of their ancestors.” History, she said, has never been the topic or focus.

In a hearing on Oct. 28, however, she said an examination of any race would reveal “things that you would be very disturbed to know.”

“But to place that burden on a little white girl, compared to another person of another ethnic or racial background, is wrong,” she said. “And she should not feel shame or guilt for something that she cannot control — one, her skin color; number two, the past that predated her.”

Myths, McCormick said, shape reality.

“And that’s precisely why I saw no value in discussing critical pedagogy — because it feels like the same old mythmaking and fear mongering that frankly we need to dispose of,” McCormick said. “Here’s the truth: Race was an organizing principle in the formation of this nation. Any racial reckoning requires an understanding of this fundamental fact.”

Smith defended his district’s use of diversity training for staff as an effort to “relentlessly create a fully unified, equitable and inclusive culture.”

“Our community set forth for us some very clear beliefs,” Smith said. “Every individual has inherent worth and deserves to be valued and celebrated. A community strength is derived from its diversity. Respecting community’s diversity and each individual’s dignity demands equitable access. A thriving community meets the basic physical, social and emotional needs of its members. Safe and caring relationships are essential for learning and growth. These are things that our community strongly believes.”

Williams recited a long list of quotes she attributed to an individual involved with the company that produces the training materials used by Smith’s district. The examples involved the role white people have played in systemic racism.

Do these examples, Williams asked, sound like they are creating a unified culture? And do kids feel more or less belonging when separated by race?

“The examples you gave are not things that we have done in the trainings in our district,” Smith said.

Rep. Kyle Hoffman, R-Coldwater, said he was frustrated with bureaucratic answers from Smith.

“We got nothing,” Hoffman said. “You gave us no specifics about what you teach.”

Hoffman also pointed out that slavery existed for “thousands upon thousands upon thousands of years” before the United States endorsed the dehumanizing trade.

“Our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, was probably could be the nail that started the ending of slavery,” Hoffman said.

Rep. Adam Thomas, R-Olathe, said there are school boards that celebrate bringing ideas of CRT into the district, although he declined to identity them.

Thomas, who is white, announced that his own family tree involves two Black nieces, a biracial niece and nephew, a Latina niece, and a niece who is gay.

“My fear for them is all of these things that we’re talking about will start to impact their relationship with me,” Thomas said. “So it’s a huge concern.”

Thomas asked if parents should have the final say in what is taught to their children. Smith said it would be impractical to give each of the parents of 27,000 students “the right to decide on every single piece of our curriculum.”

Roberts, whose verbal and written testimony was laced with anti-LGBTQ comments, said she pulled her three children out of the Shawnee Mission schools after the district offered counseling to one of her kids.

Schools should consider age appropriateness when discussing gender identity, Roberts said. She proposed that preferred pronouns can become “weaponized.”

“I just don’t want my child encouraged to be an activist,” Roberts said. “They’re very, very young. They’ve got a lot going on in the past two years. They’re still going to school in masks. They don’t get to have their homecoming. They don’t get to have anything the way that they normally did. And on top of that, our district has decided that it’s important to teach them to stand up to fight oppression, use your voice.”

Kansas Reflector stories, www.kansasreflector.com, may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
See more at https://kansasreflector.com/2022/01/30/kansas-lawmakers-rebrand-complaints-with-public-schools-in-push-for-school-choice/