Kansas schools can fight COVID-19 with fresh air, but it’s unclear how many even track ventilation

by Celia Llopis-Jepsen, Kansas News Service

.
In the span of an hour, the air in a classroom should effectively change four to six times, replaced with outdoor air and appropriately recycled indoor air.

After the pandemic hit, the largest school district in Kansas set to calculating how much outdoor air it should pull into its buildings.

Wichita Public Schools turned to the nation’s top sources for expertise, then boosted ventilation and filtration in ways that scientists say dramatically cut the risk of inhaling COVID-19.

Evidence that schools — as well as operators of other buildings that bring people together — should take those steps has solidified, buoyed by scientific findings that the virus spreads primarily through particles in the air, not by lurking on doorknobs and table tops.

Yet scientists say most American schools probably don’t bring in enough outdoor air or filter indoor air the way they should. In some schools, the windows don’t even open.

“We are under-ventilating nearly every space we spend time in indoors,” Harvard School of Public Health professor Joseph Allen said in a recent media briefing.

A year into the pandemic, some Kansas schools don’t know one of the most vital facts about their air quality: The rate at which air turns over.

In the course of a single hour, say experts at Harvard, the air in a typical classroom should effectively change out four to six times, replaced with outdoor air and appropriately recycled indoor air.

Harvard offers a five-step guide to help schools measure classroom ventilation and a list of questions that communities should ask their school leaders. Though the problem hardly starts and stops there.

Poor air quality takes a subtle daily toll on health, psychological well-being and ability to work and learn effectively, scientists warn. So though fending off COVID-19 is top of mind today, communities should push for proper ventilation and filtration in their buildings even after the pandemic is in the rearview mirror.

No regulation, little information in Kansas

No one tracks ventilation in Kansas schools, let alone whether the buildings make changes to hit targets set by engineers and public health experts for pandemic safety.

Though federal agencies say schools should take air quality seriously, infectious disease experts and engineers say the government did too little, too late to explain the urgency and the options.

In the vacuum of information, schools in Kansas and elsewhere spent on a dazzling array of products (such as ionizers) that many experts recommend avoiding.

State agencies, meanwhile, don’t employ staff with the right expertise to help districts measure their ventilation and plot a course to improvement.

The Kansas State Board of Education adopted guidelines explaining the value of ventilation and pointing schools to filters recommended by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

It doesn’t, however, require schools to act.

Not all buildings are created equal

The layout of the ducts running through Wichita schools lets the district draw in more air when it needs to.

For that, facilities director Luke Newman is grateful.

“Fresh, outside air is always going to give you a healthier space,” he said. “Whether you’re fighting COVID or just in normal circumstances.”

But many schools across the country lack heating and cooling systems that allow for adequate changes to ventilation without shelling out millions of dollars. They don’t necessarily have windows that open, either.

Some schools can supplement their ventilation with high-quality filters, such as the MERV-13s that Wichita schools installed in some high-risk areas. But many heating and cooling systems simply can’t handle those. Portable machines with HEPA filters offer another option, but don’t work in large spaces, for example.

Other options for buildings that can’t easily boost filtration and ventilation include tweaking humidity levels or attacking the virus with ultraviolet irradiation.

Getting a ‘baseline’ picture

Before choosing an approach, though, schools need to do their homework: piece together a picture of their air-change rates.

Measuring airflow in every single classroom goes beyond what most districts can take on. In Wichita, for example, the district says it would simply cost too much. It uses building-wide averages, which it says greatly exceed Harvard’s recommendations.

Marcel Harmon is a building scientist in Lawrence and a former school board member there who hit the phones when the pandemic struck, urging state and local agencies to help spread reliable information about air quality.

He recommends that schools spot-check their air-change rates in typical classrooms and other spaces around their buildings.

“At least we’d have a starting point,” he said. “We don’t even have a baseline.”

Then comes the next hurdle, exploring solutions.

“And sometimes it’s just really frustrating,” said Harmon, whose building consulting firm has worked with schools in other states. “They know they need to do something, but they don’t have it in the budget.”

Richard Corsi, dean of engineering at Portland State University, estimates a portable machine with the right kind of filter costs about $10 a year per student in a typical classroom of 20 to 25 kids.

(Visit https://twitter.com/CorsIAQ/status/1362618407066030083?s=20 to read more on Corsi’s cost estimates.)

But after a year in which many children attended school remotely and fell behind academically, Kansas urgently wants to catch them up. That means targeting money at summer or after-school programs, extra counseling or even lengthening the school year.

State education officials support improving air quality, but offer districts this advice:

“Don’t spend your first dollar upgrading your HVAC,” head of school finance Craig Neuenswander recommends. “Let’s look at some of the needs that your students are going to have coming out of the pandemic, and address those first.”

Celia Llopis-Jepsen reports on consumer health for the Kansas News Service.
You can follow her on Twitter @celia_LJ or email her at celia (at) kcur (dot) org. The Kansas News Service is a collaboration of KCUR, Kansas Public Radio, KMUW and High Plains Public Radio focused on health, the social determinants of health and their connection to public policy.
Kansas News Service stories and photos may be republished by news media at no cost with proper attribution and a link to ksnewsservice.org.

See more at https://www.kcur.org/news/2021-03-11/kansas-schools-can-fight-covid-19-with-fresh-air-but-its-unclear-how-many-even-track-ventilation.

KCK school board modifies school re-entry plan in case legislators mandate reopening date

The Kansas City, Kansas, Board of Education unanimously passed a school re-entry amendment on Tuesday night, March 9.

The amendment says the district, which had already passed its school re-entry plan last month, will offer a five-day-a-week in-person option beginning on March 26 if the Kansas Legislature passes Senate Bill 235.

State legislators have the local school board jumping through hoops as the district tries to anticipate what’s coming down next from Topeka and how it will affect the school reopening plan. School district officials said a remote learning option would still be available.

Last month, the board approved a four-day-a-week in-person re-entry plan with Wednesdays off for cleaning, with a remote option also available to parents. That plan would have taken effect April 5.

Dr. Stacy Yeager, a board member, said that she wanted to approve the school district’s recommendation on the five-day-a-week plan in order to give parents more time. As a parent, she said it was important to have as much advance notice as possible. Parents often have to have time to make child care arrangements.

Dr. Valdenia Winn, a school board member who also is a state legislator from the 34th District, said the bill has not passed at this time, and there was always a chance that it would be amended in the Legislature before it passes, if it does pass, or when it goes to conference committee.

Dr. Winn said the intent of the Senate bill was to bring all the students back to school in person, and to punish those districts that remain in remote learning, reducing their funding.

“The reality is, the Legislature is mad at COVID federal dollars that will come. They’re mad that KCK and Wichita have been remote. They’re just mad,” Dr. Winn said during the meeting.

If Senate Bill 235 doesn’t pass the Legislature, then the district would go back to its other plan of four days a week in person, with Wednesday off for cleaning, and also with the remote option still possible, according to district officials.

Board member Wanda Brownlee Paige, a former teacher, remarked that she would say what no one else wanted to say.

What the Legislature has done is taken away the power from the local school board, and they’ve done that to all the districts in the state, she said.

“They’re deciding what’s best for us,” Paige said. “What might work in western Kansas might not work in northeast Kansas, and that’s part of the problem.”

Paige urged everyone to write letters or messages to legislators expressing their views.

Parents are choosing whether students return in person or opt for remote learning. Lisa Garcia-Stewart, district director of student services, reported that by March 8, about 15,395 students had chosen in-person school, while 6,620 students opted for remote learning. They are still enrolling students, she added.

Now that there has been an amendment to the school re-entry plan, parents will be able to call the school district and change their students’ re-entry plan, to either in-person or remote, according to Matthew Andersen, interim assistant superintendent for teaching and learning.

Dr. Alicia Miguel, interim superintendent, said their thinking was that if Senate Bill 235 passed, it clearly stated that they need to offer an option. Now that parents know it might be five days a week, some parents may change their mind, she said.

That leaves only three days this week for parents to call the school district and let them know if they want to change to either in-person or remote learning, before spring break starts, according to Garcia-Stewart. Spring break is March 15 to March 19.

After that, parents will have Monday, March 22, to tell the district about any change in their children’s re-entry plans, according to Garcia-Stewart.

There will still be a certain level of uncertainty, however, as parents will not know right away if Senate Bill 235 will pass.

A group of students has already returned to the district’s school buildings, including those who may have had challenges connecting to their classrooms on the internet.

In other action, the Kansas City, Kansas, school board voted unanimously to lower the credits required for graduation for high school seniors this year.

The district had required 25 credits, while the state of Kansas had required only 21 credits. Seniors this year only will be allowed to graduate with the 21 credits required by the state, according to district officials.

Dr. Troy Pitsch, instructional improvement officer, recommended the change.

He said the district is seeing 10 times the number of hardship applications it usually sees for graduation. They’re seeing more than 200 applications, when usually the number is around 25, he said.

The new graduation requirements will drop one unit of math, from 4 required now to 3; a half unit of English, from 4.5 to 4 units; and two units of career and technical education to no units required, according to district officials. Electives will drop a half unit, from 6.5 to 6 units of electives.

There will be no change for science, social studies, physical education and fine arts requirements.

Student from KCK selected as strengths coach

Abbie Grimm of Kansas City, Kansas, has been selected as a new strengths coach at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Grimm is one of 50 students at the College of Business’ Clifton Strengths Institute. Grimm is a sophomore accounting major.

Each strengths coach will lead a team of 10 students in a course required for all first-year business students. The coaches will hold weekly meetings, facilitate one-on-one sessions and help coordinate discussions. The course demonstrates how to take one’s top strengths from the CliftonStrengths assessment, develop and apply them to achieve academic, personal and professional success.