Slight break from very high heat in today’s forecast

Photo by Steve Rupert
High temperatures Wednesday will be in the mid-90s. (National Weather Service graphic)
There is a chance for drought in the region, according to the National Drought Monitor. (National Weather Service)
Excessive heat is forecast for a few regions in the country from July 27 to Aug. 2. Currently, Wyandotte County is not in this forecast. However, Wyandotte County is close to the area for rapid onset drought risk. (National Weather Service graphic)
Hot and dry, with well above normal heat and near normal precipitation, describes the extended forecast for July 27 through Aug. 2 in this region. (National Weather Service graphic)

A slight break from the very high heat is in today’s forecast, which calls for a high of 94, according to the National Weather Service.

The heat will increase through the week and weekend, with the heat index in the 90s Wednesday and rising into the 100s for Thursday through Saturday, and reaching the 100s again next week.

The next chance for rain will come Sunday through Monday, the weather service said.

According to the weather service, moderate drought conditions exist along I-70, and fire weather concerns are gradually increasing in the region as hot and dry conditions continue.

The excessive heat risk later this week and early next week, combined with dry conditions, also could lead to rapid development of drought conditions for portions of the region, the weather service said.

Heat will build back in on Thursday and continues through the weekend, according to the weather service. There are a few chances for showers and storms late this week and into the weekend.

A front has pushed just south of the southern forecast area early this morning, with temperatures cooling into the 70s, the weather service said.

Temperatures fell into the lower 70s this morning, and breezy north winds will help keep daytime temperatures today slightly cooler behind the front, and with lower dewpoints, the heat index will stay below 100 degrees today, according to the weather service.

The cooldown will not last long as temperatures climb back into the mid 90s to near 100 Thursday afternoon, the weather service said. Lower dewpoints will help keep the heat index in check. Areas south of the Missouri River may see heat index values of 100 to 104 on Thursday, with areas north of the river staying below 100, according to the weather service.

Today, it will be sunny, with a high near 94 and a north northwest wind of 8 to 10 mph, gusting as high as 18 mph, the weather service said.

Tonight, it will be clear, with a low of 68 and a north northwest wind of 5 to 7 mph, becoming calm in the evening, according to the weather service

Thursday, it will be sunny and hot, with a high near 101 and a southwest wind of 3 to 8 mph, the weather service said.

Thursday night, it will be mostly clear, with a low of 74 and a calm wind becoming south around 5 mph after midnight, according to the weather service.

Friday, it will be mostly sunny and hot, with a high near 101, the weather service said. A south southwest wind of 5 to 11 mph will gust as high as 25 mph.

Friday night, it will be mostly clear, with a low of 79, according to the weather service.

Saturday, it will be sunny and hot, with a high near 103, the weather service said.

Saturday night, it will be mostly clear, with a low of 78, according to the weather service.

Sunday, it will be mostly sunny, with a high near 96, the weather service said.

Sunday night, there is a 40 percent chance of showers, with thunderstorms also possible after 1 a.m., according to the weather service. It will be mostly cloudy, with a low of 73.

Monday, there is a 30 percent chance of showers, with a high near 95, the weather service said.

Monday night, there is a 30 percent chance of showers, with a low of 75, according to the weather service.

Tuesday, it will be mostly sunny and hot, with a high near 100, the weather service said.

KCK school board hears audit findings

Final audit findings and recommendations were presented at Tuesday night’s meeting of the Kansas City, Kansas, Board of Education.

Dr. Anna Stubblefield, superintendent, presented the findings to the Kansas City, Kansas, Public Schools board.

One of the studies, an “environmental scan,” was done by the University of Kansas and recommended some changes in alignment and focus, building culture, with attention to human resources and special education.

The KU findings included positives, but also pointed out issues with district focus, integration of initiatives and clarity of roles and responsibilities. Also, a lack of familiarity regarding strategic direction and organization and climate quandaries were noted.

Also there was a need for more comprehensive and cohesive communication strategy, better data to support measurable targets and ongoing feedback, according to the findings. Special education services needed to be strengthened, and areas targeted for review.

Performance measures need room to grow, but the district also needs to be careful when making comparisons, one of the recommendations stated.

Another audit, according to Dr. Stubblefield, led to a Kansas Association of School Boards audit.

The KASB human resources study made recommendations involving various aspects of human resources, including extensive work needed with the employee information database, sub-finding system and application systems.

Other KASB recommendations included support for securing substitute staff, adjusting internal transfer policies, consistent expectations on documenting of references, reviewing interview procedures to ensure consistent processes are used between buildings, establishing a systemwide process to reduce competition between hiring managers, developing a common communication expectation when an offer is extended, developing consistent training and support in employee evaluation and improvement process, and establishing clear pathways for initial training of staff and ongoing development.

Another audit, from Burns-Van Fleet, contained recommendations to reorganize departments, develop an onboarding system, move payroll functions to the business department, maintain professional development in one area, respond to communications promptly, streamline internal communications, review salary schedules for fairness, obtain and assemble exit data, not re-employ terminated persons, leaders should understand education and school law, better understanding of the negotiated agreement and a clearer system to implement board decisions.

“Children come first and achievement comes first,” Dr. Valdenia Winn, a board member, said. If it takes a hard decision from the board, the board needs to do it and not sit on its hands, she added.

Dr. Stubblefield said there are plans to hold meetings with departments to work toward meeting recommendations. She also showed organizational charts and introduced several new district officials who are heading departments.

At the request of board member Rachel Russell, Dr. Stubblefield said she could post a survey that would allow parents and district patrons to express their thoughts on the studies. Also, the parents and patrons could contact board members with specific questions.

The details of the studies and environmental scans will be placed on the district’s website, Dr. Stubblefield said.

“The public realizes this is not the first audit that has been conducted,” Dr. Valdenia Winn, a board member, said.

One was conducted three years ago, but the majority of board did not like it and no action was taken, she said.

She asked the board to set aside time to consider the recommendations that would require a change in policy.

“The public needs to know we will not just sit on these audits,” Dr. Winn said.

It is past time for the board to receive audits, she added. She encouraged people who were interested to read the audits and hold the district’s feet to the fire to do what is best for the children.

“Children come first and achievement comes first,” Dr. Winn said. If it takes a hard decision from the board, the board needs to do it and not sit on its hands, she added.

COVID policy not adopted

In other action, the school board voted not to adopt Option 2 of a COVID-19 policy, that would have continued some district policies about COVID-19.

The policy that was voted down would have followed KDHE, CDC and local Health Department guidelines on community levels to determine masking guidelines. It would have used a testing program that would allow students and staff to continue in-person learning. Masking would have been based on the most conservative level of COVID determined by the state and CDC.

Instead, Tiffany Lewis, the district’s director of health services, will return to a future board meeting with a proposed COVID-19 policy that adapts one that is recommended by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment.

Currently, the district is without any COVID policy because the policies that were formerly in place expired at the end of the school year, according to officials. However, there are some Health Department guidelines in place.

The vote was 4-3 against option 2. Voting against it were Yolanda Clark, Maxine Drew, Randy Lopez and Janey Humphries. Voting in favor of it were Wanda Brownlee Paige, Rachel Russell and Dr. Winn.
Clark said she preferred to discuss a “customized” Option 2 to be presented at a future meeting.

“I just want us to keep everyone safe,” board member Paige said. COVID-19 numbers are now going up and many employees are concerned about remaining safe, she added.

Wyandotte County recently was again placed in the “red” zone for high community spread of COVID, according to a recent Unified Government Health Department news release.

Board president re-elected

In other action, the board president, Randy Lopez, was re-elected at Tuesday night’s meeting. Clark was re-elected vice president.

The board took two votes. On the first vote, to consider Paige as the president, the “no” votes were Clark, Drew, Humphries and Lopez, with those voting “yes” including Paige, Russell and Dr. Winn.

On the subsequent vote to consider Lopez as president, those voting “yes included Clark, Drew, Humphries, Lopez and Russell, with Paige and Dr. Winn voting “no.”

The environmental scan report has been posted at https://kckps.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/KCKPSEnvironmentalScan22.pdf.

The KASB human resources report has been posted at https://kckps.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/USD-500-HR-Study-Report.pdf.

Organization leading fight against abortion amendment tops $6.5 million in donations

Major groups supporting change to Kansas constitution haven’t submitted reports

by Tim Carpenter, Kansas Reflector

Topeka — The organization leading the effort to defeat an Aug. 2 abortion amendment to the Kansas Constitution took in $6.54 million in contributions since start of the year and spent two-thirds of that cash on advertising to influence primary voters.

Money available to both sides of the amendment debate is of interest because Kansas voters will be the first to weigh in on abortion rights since the U.S. Supreme Court reversed 50 years of precedent by striking Roe v. Wade in June.

Kansans for Constitutional Freedom, which is working for preservation of abortion rights, said in a new financial disclosure report filed with the Kansas Governmental Ethics Commission that organizations prioritizing access to health care delivered the bulk of that donation total. More than 4,900 donations from Kansans in 80 of the state’s 105 counties accounted for $488,000 since January.

Ashley All, spokesperson for Kansans for Constitutional Freedom, said the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide served as a “wake-up call for many Kansans.”

“We definitely saw an increase in grassroots donations following the decision,” she said. “However, most of our supporters already understood the serious implications of this amendment. Women across the state would lose the constitutional right to make private medical decisions for themselves and their families. And politicians would move quickly to ban abortion completely with no exceptions.”

Groups opposed to abortion and in support of changing the Kansas Constitution, including Kansans for Life, Value Them Both Association and the Catholic dioceses of Wichita and Kansas City, Kansas, haven’t updated finance reports since Feburary. For nonpartisan ballot measures, church advocacy is allowed in Kansas.

Value Them Both Association reported five months ago it had received $1.22 million in donations, with nearly all that haul from three sources. They were: Archdiocese of Kansas City, Kansas, $500,000; Kansans for Life, $390,000; and Catholic Diocese of Wichita, $250,000.

Those totals didn’t include $1.3 million given last month to the anti-abortion side by Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America.

Kansans for Constitutional Freedom’s financial report said the organization spent $5.8 million as of July 18. Of the total, $4.05 million was devoted to television and radio advertising and production, $512,000 to digital advertising and consulting services and $463,000 to direct mail and printing.

The most significant donations included $1.38 million from Sixteen Thirty Fund, which supports affordable health care and action on climate change. Stacy Schusterman, a Tulsa, Oklahoma, philanthropist and businesswoman contributed $1 million, while Amy and Rob Stavis of the New Schools Venture Fund provided $250,000.

Planned Parenthood Action Fund’s contribution was $850,000. Planned Parenthood Great Plains, serving the Kansas City metropolitan area, and a separate organization Planned Parenthood Great Plains Votes combined to provide $492,000. Trust Women and the Trust Us Justice Fund, based in Wichita, provided $89,000. North Fund, a nonpartisan organization that helped with expansion of Medicaid in Missouri, contributed $500,000.

Other large donors: American Civil Liberties Union, $250,000; ACLU of Kansas, $112,500; Center for Reproductive Rights, $125,000; and NARAL, $100,000.

A 2019 decision by the Kansas Supreme Court declaring the Kansas Constitution’s Bill of Rights contained a right to bodily autonomy, including abortion, generated blowback in the Kansas Legislature. State lawmakers by two-thirds majorities placed on Aug. 2 primary ballots an amendment that would repudiate the state Supreme Court’s interpretation of the right to abortion in Kansas.

If a simple majority of Kansans voted “no” on the amendment, the right to abortion in the state constitution would be preserved and status quo on abortion regulation would be retained pending future action by state government. If a majority of those voting on the amendment marked “yes” on their ballot, the state Supreme Court’s decision of three years ago would be nullified.

Passage of the amendment wouldn’t immediately eliminate exceptions to abortion restrictions or result in a ban on abortion in Kansas, but adoption of the amendment would grant the Legislature more leverage over the controversial issue. The House and Senate could do anything from maintaining current laws on abortion regulation to imposing a ban on the procedure within the state of Kansas.

Political advocates of the amendment decided the statewide vote would occur during the August primary rather than the November general election when turnout by Democrats and independents could be higher. All registered voters in Kansas, including independents, can participate in the primary vote on the abortion amendment. A simple majority of those who cast ballots on the amendment will decide the issue.

Kansas Reflector stories, www.kansasreflector.com, may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
See more at https://kansasreflector.com/2022/07/19/organization-leading-fight-against-abortion-amendment-tops-6-5-million-in-donations/