Higher patient count, unsteady state funding made waves for Osawatomie State Hospital

Policymakers failed to provide long-term funding after move toward community-based mental health care in 1990s

by Megan Hart, KHI News Service

Editor’s note: The KHI News Service conducted a months-long investigation into what led federal officials to deem Osawatomie State Hospital as a facility too dangerous for Medicare patients and whether officials can rebuild the hospital for a successful future. This is the second story in a series.

The problems that led federal inspectors to decertify Osawatomie State Hospital might have been prevented if a succession of Kansas governors and lawmakers had funded community-based mental health programs intended to reduce the need for state institutions.

Kansas had relied on state hospitals to care for its residents with mental illness for most of the state’s history. It gradually reduced that reliance throughout the 20th century, and legislators saw an opportunity in the 1990s to shift more people and services to community mental health centers, possibly eliminating the need for the hospitals. After Topeka State Hospital closed in 1997, the state had 340 public psychiatric beds, or about one-third as many as it had at the start of the decade.

Successive governors and legislatures had implemented reforms in the 1990 Mental Health Reform Act to de-emphasize institutional care. But they didn’t follow through with the funding that community mental health centers needed to fulfill their role in the new system.

Through the early 2000s, the combination of those two factors increased the pressure on state hospitals to serve the needs of Kansans who had serious mental illnesses and nowhere else to go. Eventually, those strains would contribute to federal officials’ decision to stop paying to send Medicare patients to OSH, which in December 2015 they deemed a dangerous facility where care was lacking.

The state hospitals were able to handle the pressure for a while, said Don Jordan, who was superintendent of OSH from 2002 to 2005 and secretary of the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services from 2006 to 2010.

Newer antipsychotic medications allowed hospitals to stabilize patients more quickly and discharge them to the community for care instead of keeping them for long periods of treatment, he said.

“Things were possible that weren’t possible before,” Jordan said.

Still, even with shorter stays and new tools, OSH frequently was over capacity as early as 2003. The hospital attempted to manage its patient load but topped its 176-patient limit often in 2005. SRS tried various plans to reduce the overcrowding, starting as early as 2006, but OSH remained overcrowded for much of the next five years.

Overcrowding is a safety issue because it raises patients’ stress, and therefore the risk of conflict, said Steve Feinstein, who was superintendent of OSH from 1994 to 1998.

“If you’re mentally ill, you’re really struggling from day to day just to maintain,” he said.

Units typically were over capacity by one or two patients, said Greg Valentine, who was superintendent of OSH and Rainbow Mental Health Facility in Kansas City from 2005 to 2011. But being above capacity was a concern because OSH often couldn’t admit new patients until someone could be approved for release, he said.

“Sometimes there was a tension on who could be discharged safely,” he said. “We had a huge demand for beds.”

Running over capacity was a challenge, but it wasn’t new or unique to OSH, said Ray Dalton, deputy secretary of SRS from 2006 to 2011.

“Even years before that, all across the state, hospitals were struggling with their mental health capacity,” he said. “It required a lot more management, a lot more cooperation between the state hospitals and the private side.”

Recession drops budget, increases demand

Ultimately, the situation at OSH came to the attention of federal inspectors. In 2006, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said that OSH wasn’t individualizing patient treatment and discharge plans, and would need to hire additional staff or risk losing its certification and federal payments. The hospital doubled down on treatment, Valentine said, and for a while federal officials were satisfied.

“We had already recognized that we needed to beef up active treatment,” he said. “Our treatment became very targeted.”

It wasn’t smooth sailing from there, though. The Great Recession hit in December 2007, bringing with it reduced state revenues and increased admissions to state hospitals at a time when Kansas couldn’t afford more staffing, medications and other necessities of providing care.

Psychiatric hospital admissions tend to go up during economic downturns, because extra stress can push people who struggle to manage their illnesses to the breaking point, Feinstein said.

And because state hospitals are required to serve everyone who needs care, it’s difficult to control costs in lean budget years.

The state held hospital spending roughly steady from 2006 to 2010. But costs soon outstripped the funding as patient numbers continued to increase.

Admissions to OSH rose 12 percent from 2007 to 2008, which is steep compared to typical fluctuations.

Despite the increased admissions, Valentine received only about half of the money he requested in 2007 to hire additional staff. One year later, OSH stopped paying overtime to its staff and dropped one of its eight treatment teams because of increased costs. That left the hospital with fewer employees to provide care for an increasing number of patients.

“Being over census has taken its toll on our budget,” Valentine told the Legislature in April 2008. “Our outside medical costs are up, our pharmaceutical costs are up, our food costs are skyrocketing. Those are things you cannot avoid. You have to feed people. You have to medicate people.”

At the time, SRS raised concerns that failing to hire more staff could jeopardize care at OSH.

“Ensuring active treatment requires a significant number of direct care staff,” then-SRS Deputy Secretary Dalton told legislators in 2008. “OSH has been able to maintain Medicaid and Medicare certification through dedicated efforts from treatment staff. However, at current staff levels, they are struggling to maintain the improvements that have been achieved.”

The Legislature and administrations of Gov. Kathleen Sebelius and Gov. Mark Parkinson, both Democrats, didn’t come up with the money to increase staffing at the hospitals, however. They cut funding for community mental health by 5 percent in fiscal year 2009 and 20 percent in 2010 as the Kansas economy remained mired in the recession.

The cuts limited the ability of community mental health centers to serve the increasing number of people with psychiatric needs, and SRS instructed the centers to focus only on people with severe mental health issues.

Like the hospitals, community mental health centers can’t turn away people who need their services. But sometimes they must reduce the number of sessions a person receives per week below the ideal level, said Bill Persinger, CEO of Valeo Behavioral Health Care in Topeka. They find ways to be more efficient but can’t always provide services with the intensity they would prefer, particularly as more people seek help, he said.

“What you’ve had is a perfect storm of frozen or reduced funding, increased demand and fewer resources,” he said.

A tension emerged in the public system as state hospitals and community mental health centers coped with increasing workloads — though representatives from each were quick to emphasize they didn’t blame their counterparts.

Community mental health centers had concerns that some patients were leaving OSH before they were well enough to continue healing with the level of services available in their communities, Persinger said.

At the same time, then-OSH superintendent Valentine said the hospital also noted delays when it tried to discharge a patient, because community mental health centers sometimes weren’t able to immediately provide needed services.

“It’s a system, so what affects one part of the system affects the whole system,” he said. “When we were ready to discharge someone, the mental health centers had their hands full.”

More beds lost at Rainbow

While some parts of state government have seen financial relief since the recession ended in Kansas in early 2010, budgets for community mental health centers remain below pre-recession levels to this day. The state hospitals fared better for a time, though for several years their state funding fell below pre-recession levels, even as their costs increased.

With overcrowding still an issue at state hospitals, SRS officials told the Legislature in early 2010 that people in crisis were being housed in jails if a bed wasn’t available.

The situation worsened in 2011 when Rainbow Mental Health Facility in Kansas City was forced to drastically reduce capacity, leaving patients who would have used those beds few alternatives other than OSH.

Federal inspectors had found Rainbow to be understaffed, and the State Fire Marshal cited it for numerous safety hazards that could make an evacuation difficult. SRS opened a new 30-bed unit at OSH to absorb some of the Rainbow patients, but that didn’t fully replace the 44 beds the system lost in Kansas City.

Despite those challenges, federal inspectors gave OSH high marks in 2011. But it wouldn’t last. An effort by the administration of newly elected Republican Gov. Sam Brownback to reduce staffing costs soon would set into motion a chain of events that resulted in the hospital’s decertification in 2015.

“It was very disheartening to see everything we built go from zero deficiencies to decertification in, what, four years,” Valentine said. “I’m still puzzling about how they couldn’t make CMS happy.”

Next: Recruiting and retaining employees at Osawatomie State Hospital has long been a challenge, but the issue worsened when a large number opted to take early retirement incentives.

The nonprofit KHI News Service is an editorially independent initiative of the Kansas Health Institute and a partner in the Heartland Health Monitor reporting collaboration. All stories and photos may be republished at no cost with proper attribution and a link back to KHI.org when a story is reposted online.

– See more at http://www.khi.org/news/article/higher-patient-count-unsteady-state-funding-made-waves-for-osawatomie-state#sthash.2m8JoWFs.dpuf

Enjoy the outdoors with a picnic

by Lori Wuellner

July is National Picnic month and summer picnics are a great way to enjoy the outdoors with family and friends.

Keep your picnics healthy and safe this summer by remembering the following tips:

• Time and temperature…Remember that the time perishable food can be left outside the refrigerator or freezer is only one hour when the temperatures outside are above 90 degrees F. The best advice: keep hot food hot and cold food cold at all times.

• Use a food thermometer…According to USDA, 1 out of every 4 hamburgers turns brown in the middle before it has reached a safe internal temperature of 160 degrees F. The only way to be sure food is safely cooked is to use a food thermometer. For all whole cuts (steaks, chops, roasts) of meat, including pork, beef, lamb and veal, cook to 145 degrees F and then allow for a 3 minute rest time before carving and consuming.

• Bring non-perishable foods…Reduce the worry of keeping foods at certain temperatures by limiting the number of perishable foods. Try bringing baked potato chips or pretzels instead of potato salad; washed whole fruit, dried fruit, or fruit cups instead of a fruit salad; and other snacks such as trail mix, nuts, or sunflower seeds. Give the recipe below a try.

• Two coolers are better than one…Bring two coolers to the gathering. One for perishable food and one for beverages. Keep perishable foods cool by transporting them in an insulated cooler kept cold with ice or frozen gel packs. Open as infrequently as possible. Store drinks in another cooler.

• Keep it clean…Make sure you check ahead and find out if there’s a source of safe drinking water at your destination. If not, bring water for preparation and cleaning; or pack clean, wet, disposable cloths or moist towelettes and paper towels for cleaning hands and surfaces.

• Dangers of cross-contamination…Cross-contamination is the transfer of harmful bacteria to food from other foods, cutting boards, and utensils when they are not handled properly. It can happen during preparation, grilling, and serving food and is a prime cause of foodborne illness. Remember to wash your hands before and after handling foods, and don’t use the same platter and utensils for raw and cooked meat and poultry. Include lots of clean utensils, not only for eating but also for serving the safely cooked food.

For more information check out the K-State Extension’s Food Safety Website at http://www.ksre.k-state.edu/foodsafety/ where you’ll find everything you need to know about food safety and so much more.

(Source: July: National Picnic Month, University of Nebraska Extension)

Lori Wuellner is a Wyandotte County Extension agent, Family and Consumer Sciences, K-State Research and Extension, 1216 N. 79th St., Kansas City, Kan. Telephone 913-299-9300, email [email protected].

Granola to Go
12 Servings

Ingredients
2/3 c. brown sugar, packed
1/4 c. 100 percent apple juice
2 1/2 c. old fashioned oatmeal
1 c. cereal, crunchy nugget
3/4 c. dried fruit
1 c. almonds or sunflower seeds
1/4 tsp. cinnamon
1/4 tsp. salt
Directions
1. Combine brown sugar and apple juice in a large nonstick skillet. Cook over medium high heat three minutes, stirring frequently, until sugar dissolves.
2. Add the remaining ingredients to the sugar mixture. Cook five minutes or until granola is lightly browned, stirring frequently. Cool completely.
3. Store in an airtight container up to two weeks.
Nutrition Information per Serving: Calories 192, Total Fat 5 g (7% DV), Saturated Fat 1 g (2% DV), Cholesterol 0 mg (0% DV), Sodium 126 mg (5% DV), Total Carbohydrate 35 g (27% DV), Dietary Fiber 3 g (12% DV), Sugars 20 g, Protein 4 g, Vitamin A 7%, Vitamin C 1%, Calcium 4%, Iron 24%

Federal officials hear KanCare concerns as renewal looms

by Andy Marso, KHI News Service

A pair of federal officials heard a litany of concerns from KanCare providers and clients Tuesday in Salina as the state prepares to apply for renewal of the managed care Medicaid program.

James G. Scott, associate regional administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Megan Buck, the agency’s program services branch manager, heard about problems with applying for Medicaid, cuts to services and provider reimbursements, and difficulties getting help from the state during the forum at the Bicentennial Center.

Rick Cagan, executive director of the Kansas chapter of the National Association for Mental Illness, told Buck and Scott that the complaints should give federal officials pause as they consider the upcoming application to renew the program past 2018.

“KanCare experiment is still very flawed, and you’re hearing that from many people here today,” Cagan said.

In November 2011, Gov. Sam Brownback announced his plan to reform the state’s Medicaid program. Three private insurance companies were selected to run the $3 billion KanCare program, which launched in 2013 and provides health insurance for more than 425,000 Kansans.

A spokeswoman for state agencies disputed claims that the problems described Tuesday are systemic, telling the Topeka Capital-Journal that the program is working well for most on Medicaid.

But during the forum, providers described a Medicaid system at a breaking point, with cuts to programs meant to keep Kansans out of hospitals and nursing homes coming as those facilities also struggle with reimbursement reductions and long waits for residents’ Medicaid applications to process.

“I have not been approved for a single Medicaid application in my building since October,” said Haely Ordoyne, co-owner of a nursing home in Washington County called Centennial Homestead.

Ordoyne said almost 70 percent of the residents at her 31-bed facility rely on Medicaid.

She and other nursing home administrators, like Charles Smith of Medicalodges in Coffeyville, have watched residents struggle to get applications processed since the state switched to a new computer system last year and funneled all applications through a single KanCare Clearinghouse in Topeka.

Smith said the current wait times are “getting ridiculous” and his small chain of homes is carrying more than $2 million in uncompensated care for Medicaid-pending residents.

Providers of home and community-based support services for Kansans with disabilities said years of stagnant reimbursements have left them unable to recruit and retain enough staff.

Administrators from hospitals large and small said a 4 percent cut in Medicaid reimbursements approved by Gov. Sam Brownback to help balance the budget would make it financially harder for them to provide their full array of services to Medicaid patients.

“Since 1897 when our hospital was founded, we have never reached this type of crossroads,” said Bob Finuf, vice president of Children’s Mercy in Kansas City, adding that Medicaid is a topic of concern at every board meeting. “It’s reached a point where we have to consider options we’ve never had to think about that are extremely anti-cultural to us.”

Scott and Buck listened quietly throughout hours of testimony, asking few questions until the open mic period at the end, when they talked through individual cases with people who stepped up from the crowd of more than 100.

Scott sought to assure the audience members that their concerns were not falling on deaf ears.

Sean Gatewood, lobbyist for the KanCare Advocates Network, which was the host of the event, provided several suggestions for federal officials as they consider the KanCare renewal. They included removing home and community-based services from KanCare, like they were in the program’s first year.

At a minimum, Gatewood said, the state should not be allowed to make further major changes to Medicaid, such as combining waiver services for Kansans with disabilities, while the current problems remain.

“They haven’t proven hypothesis one,” Gatewood said. “We shouldn’t let them go to hypothesis five.”

The nonprofit KHI News Service is an editorially independent initiative of the Kansas Health Institute and a partner in the Heartland Health Monitor reporting collaboration. All stories and photos may be republished at no cost with proper attribution and a link back to KHI.org when a story is reposted online.

– See more at http://www.khi.org/news/article/federal-officials-hear-kancare-concerns-as-renewal-looms#sthash.2QKku7pf.dpuf