Barnes asks for election recount

Nathan Barnes, who ended up one vote shy of advancing to the general election after the canvass of votes Monday, has now formally asked for a recount, which will be conducted on Wednesday. (Staff file photo by Mary Rupert)
Nathan Barnes, who ended up one vote shy of advancing to the general election after the canvass of votes Monday, has now formally asked for a recount, which will be conducted on Wednesday. (Staff file photo by Mary Rupert)

Nathan Barnes, a candidate for Unified Government commissioner, 1st District at large, who came in one vote short of going on to the general election, has filed for a vote recount today, Election Commissioner Bruce Newby said.

Newby said the recount will be conducted at 9 a.m. Wednesday, March 11, at the Election Office, 850 State Ave.

After the recount, the Board of Canvassers will meet soon, and he will try to convene them on Friday, to certify the vote recount, he said. It will be the board’s decision whether to accept the recount numbers or not. He added he will not release the vote recount until after the Board of Canvassers has certified it.

In the canvass of votes, the official certified total that was announced on Monday, March 9, was Melissa Bynum, 1,129 votes; Mark Gilstrap, 1,105 votes; and Nathan Barnes, 1,104 votes. Only the top two go on to the general election.

The number of votes changed slightly at the canvass, because 43 provisional votes were counted, but the outcome of the election did not change Monday. Another 24 provisional votes were not counted by the Board of Canvassers.

Barnes, a UG commissioner for 18 years from the 1st District, paid a $2,730 bond in order to ask for a recount today, Newby said.

The recount will cover all the ballots that were cast for the UG Commission 1st District, at large contest, Newby said. It totals 62 precincts, about 5,000 ballots. It will be a recount of every ballot cast in that contest, he said.

Newby said the cost of the recount is less than what has been previously charged. When he first started, he estimated the cost of a recount at $6,000, and a few years ago, it was $3,500, he said. He said he has pinpointed the costs of the recount, as allowed under state law, to include items such as the cost of personnel to do the recount, a special board, temporary employees and other costs outlined under the law.

Newby said Barnes has requested the recount to be done by hand. The election night vote count was done by optical scan readers, a machine count, he said.

Newby said his previous experience with recounts is that the election results were “dead-on.”

“I’m not saying at this point the numbers won’t change, but I sure don’t expect it to happen,” he said. “If it does happen I will want to know why.”

“But I have never found the machines to be off, only people,” Newby said. “It was the reason we went to voting machines in the first place, because people couldn’t count.”

Another issue was raised at the canvass on Monday, and Newby said he asked for a legal opinion on a question that was raised by another candidate. BPU candidate Thomas Gordon brought up the issue of an “objections board.”

Newby said that he received a legal opinion after the meeting that the statute quoted by Gordon applied only to the nomination process and not the conduct of the election. The statute does not apply to the normal procedures for challenging an election, which include either asking for a recount or a contest of an election in court, Newby said.

Newby said he has to start sending ballots out for the April 7 general election soon. The ballots can’t be printed until the primary election results are final.

To see an earlier story, visit https://wyandotteonline.com/one-vote-shy-of-advancing-barnes-says-hell-ask-for-vote-recount/.

Barnes: Primary election not quite over yet

Nathan Barnes (Staff file photo)[/
Nathan Barnes (Staff file photo)

by Mary Rupert
The primary election is not quite over yet, according to Nathan Barnes, who was in third place for the Unified Government Commission, 1st District at large position.

Second-place winner Mark Gilstrap had 10 votes more than Barnes. First-place winner Melissa Bynum had 23 more votes than Gilstrap in the close contest.

The unofficial vote Tuesday night was Melissa Bynum, 1,125; Mark Gilstrap, 1,102; and Nathan Barnes, 1,092.

Barnes, a UG commissioner from the 1st District for 18 years, said today that election results are still pending until they are certified on Monday morning.

It’s been his experience that usually there are about 30 ballots or so that are “provisional,” he said, and the board of canvassers has to decide whether to count them or not.

Barnes said he would have to wait until after the canvass Monday to decide whether or not to ask for a recount.

He said he is currently investigating to see why his election mailer did not reach some addresses on the east side of Kansas City, Kan., before the election. It reached some addresses in the 66109 and 66112 areas on the west side before the election, but not on the east side of the city, he said. Some persons on the east side of the city received his mailer today, he said. He added it appeared to him that the mailers were dropped off at the post office on time.

“I know there would have been 12 votes on this end of town if I’d got my mailer out,” Barnes said.

Barnes also had an automated telephone call that reached some voters, as did several other candidates. Barnes’ campaign helped encourage voters to go to the polls early or to use mail-in ballots in advance voting, but his numbers of advance voters were not quite as high as he had hoped, he said.

Bynum, Gilstrap advance to general election for UG, 1st District, at large contest

In unofficial returns, Melissa Bynum and Mark Gilstrap advanced to the general election for the Unified Government Commission, 1st District, at large contest.

Bynum was in first place with 23 votes to spare. She received 1,125 votes to Gilstrap’s 1,102 votes.

Nathan Barnes, who led most of the evening, was a very close third, with 1,092 votes, only 10 votes short of Gilstrap.

Melissa Bynum (Staff file photo)
Melissa Bynum (Staff file photo)

Mark Gilstrap (Staff file photo)
Mark Gilstrap (Staff file photo)

The leader of the UG Commission, 4th District, contest was Harold Johnson, with 470 votes.

In second place was incumbent Commissioner Tarence Maddox, with 306 votes.

Harold Johnson (Staff file photo)
Harold Johnson (Staff file photo)

Tarence Maddox (Staff file photo)
Tarence Maddox (Staff file photo)

In the Board of Public Utilities, at large, position 3, contest, Chris McCord was leading with 2,020 votes.

In second place was Norm Scott with 1,886 votes.

Chris McCord (Staff file photo)
Chris McCord (Staff file photo)

Norm Scott (Staff file photo)
Norm Scott (Staff file photo)

These are final unofficial returns. Twenty-five precincts of 25 are reporting.

Voter turnout was 6,406, which is 9.9 percent of the registered voters.

It was a better turnout than the February 2013 primary election, when there was a 7.9 percent turnout, and a snowstorm. The March 2011 primary election had a 7.9 percent turnout.

The general election will be April 7.

UG Commissioner, 1st District at large

Nathan Barnes 1,092
Melissa Brune Bynum 1,125
Mark Gilstrap 1,102
LaVert A. Murray 721
Tamika Pledger 122
Christal Watson 538
Janice (Grant) Witt 178

UG Commissioner, 4th District

Harold Johnson 470
Tarence L. Maddox 306
Scott C. Murray 105

BPU, at large position 3

Murray D. Anderson Sr. 838
Thomas H. Gordon 1,237
Chris McCord 2,020
Norman D. Scott 1,886