Mayor proposes half-cent sales tax, mill levy decrease

by Mary Rupert

A half-cent sales tax proposal with a mill levy decrease got a surprised and emotional response on Thursday night from the Unified Government Commission.

Mayor Tyrone Garner recommended an 8.5-mill property tax reduction, along with a change in the payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) fee found on the Board of Public Utilities bills. The property tax would be set at the “revenue neutral” rate.

The half-cent sales tax could go before voters at the August primary election, according to the mayor’s proposal.

The mayor also proposed conducting an organizational analysis of the UG departments to find efficiencies.

Kathleen von Achen, UG chief financial officer, explained that the UG also is looking at separating the PILOT fee, which is placed on BPU bills, into separate categories, including one PILOT fee for residential and another for other classes of customers. The PILOT fee is currently 11.9 percent. If there were separate classes, there would be more flexibility for the UG Commission to decide how much to charge for the PILOT fee, she said. She said more details on this would be presented at the March 31 UG Commission meeting.

The proposed sales tax would only be for the city of Kansas City, Kansas, not for the county, she said.

The UG has two options, a special purpose sales tax or a general purpose sales tax, she said. The mayor is recommending a “temporary half-penny,” a dedicated half-cent sales tax for 10 years.

The sales tax would generate an estimated $196 million in sales and use tax revenue, with an average of $19.6 million per year, she said. In 2023, it would generate about $17 million.

Facility and road improvement projects could be funded with the sales tax, she said. Some examples of projects under consideration are fire station reconstructions; fire and police training facility; police patrol stations and existing facility improvements; police equipment and technology enhancements; parks and recreation spray parks, new recreation center and recreation facility improvements; new transit and UG services building in midtown; and street and road reconstruction projects throughout KCK, she said.

To put the sales tax on the Aug. 2 ballot, the UG needs to introduce it at the May 9 Economic Development and Finance Committee meeting, she said. The proposed timeline calls for a May 26 UG Commission ordinance approval. June 1 is the deadline to give the language to the Election Commissioner to place on the ballot. If the measure passes the primary election on Aug. 2, the tax would be collected starting Jan. 1, 2023.

The current property tax levy collects $110 million for the UG, von Achen said. The assessed value of the county is increasing about 12 percent for the next revenue year, to result in more revenue, estimated at $123 million in 2023, she said.

If the UG collects the same amount in 2023 as it does today, it would have to reduce the revenues to be at the “revenue neutral” rate, she said. About $13.6 million would be the difference, a reduction of about 8.5 mills.

The UG Commission usually has until late August to decide on its annual budget, and the initial response Thursday night pointed to a likelihood that there could be changes to the recommendations over the course of the next few months.

UG commissioners reacted to the different way of presenting the budget process. Commissioner Brian McKiernan remarked that he expected the commissioners to talk about their vision of the budget first, then to discuss specific budget details later. He said community surveys showed the most important thing to the residents was fixing the infrastructure, including streets and sidewalks.

Commissioner Mike Kane said it was his 18th budget, and he had never seen anything like it. He would rather have had the commission talk about what the commissioners wanted first. He also said he remembered last year that some commissioners wanted to lower the mill levy by one mill this year.

The 8.5 mills seemed to be a lot to some commissioners. Commissioner Kane said he was for a mill levy reduction, but he didn’t want to strap the next commission that much.

Commissioner Christian Ramirez said he felt the proposals were aggressive and fast. He thought if the UG put a sales tax on the August primary, that it wouldn’t pass. He said the UG took a community survey where residents responded with an overwhelming “no” to a question about a sales tax for parks.

The current national and world situation may be having its effect on the commission’s viewpoint, also. Talk of a recession was in national news this week, along with other challenges that may result in a commission viewpoint that is more likely to hold onto current revenues. Commissioner Ramirez said they’re still going through the effects of the pandemic, with dire situations going on in the world, including war, and they don’t know how that’s going to turn out.

Commissioner Ramirez said he wondered what would get cut and what services they would lose. He said important issues at the end of the budget discussion last year included reinforcement of the workforce and maintenance of infrastructure, and he thought they would be important this year, also.

Commissioner Andrew Davis thought the meeting was a “waste of our time.” He said there was a need for the mayor and everyone to come to the table and compromise.

Commissioner Melissa Bynum said she didn’t see how a “revenue neutral” concept would grow the community in any way, and it is a conversation they need to have later.

Commissioner Chuck Stites said he was in favor of lower taxes, but he also didn’t want to handcuff the government to the point where they can’t take care of the needs of the infrastructure. He also wanted the governing bodies including schools to meet together to discuss reducing the mill levy.

Commissioner Angela Markley said she didn’t think the UG’s guiding star should be the state’s revenue neutral concept. The UG’s goal is to grow its tax base, she said. The UG’s guiding star should be the community survey, she added.

Commissioner Tom Burroughs told the commission that the reason why Kansas has a revenue neutral law is that local governments weren’t listening to residents, so the residents went to the state Legislature. Commissioner Burroughs said he wanted to see a mill levy reduction. He wanted to advocate for taxpayers and said if the UG doesn’t lower taxes, it could see an exodus to the rural communities.

Commissioner Harold Johnson said that at a 30,000-foot level, with lowering the mill levy and increasing the sales tax, “it looks like we’re trying to rob Peter to pay Paul.” They need to have a comprehensive strategy with the various governing bodies in the county, he said.

Mayor Garner said the Thursday meeting was designed to have these robust discussions, and that the meeting was not a waste of time. He said his recommendation was based on many meetings with residents who told him their taxes and fees were too high. He had campaigned on issues including lower taxes.

“I’ve watched people on fixed incomes say they can’t take it,” he said. He also mentioned other examples of people losing their homes and developers leaving the community.

“I’m going to fight for what this community voted me into office for, and that is to give them the relief that they deserve,” Mayor Garner said.

His recommendation was only to start the discussion on the budget, he added. The proposed sales tax increase would mean that people who are here only through the workday but live elsewhere might contribute more to the tax base.

There was also a retreat-like session following the initial presentation, led by Ed O’Malley of the Kansas Leadership Center, in which the commissioners expressed their opinions about their vision for the community, and its greatest challenges.

More details can be found at the video of the meeting, online at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaKuByl5EQw.

5 thoughts on “Mayor proposes half-cent sales tax, mill levy decrease”

  1. I applaud Mayor Garnet’s efforts and agree with his approach. WyCo taxes are too high and BPU fees are exorbitant. Residents do not see the expected services for what we are paying. Status quo is not acceptable and Commissioners need to understand changes have to be made.

    1. I moved to Wyco almost 2 years ago after being away for 30 years. I came back to help my mother in her last years on this earth. I have found my property tax on my vehicle averaging out more than $ 125. higher than Overland Park, JoCo. I don’t have to tell you that I overplayed for the home I acquired and the taxes are astronomical for my home. The last 4 homes on my street don’t even have curbs and a storm drain. I had to build my own drain basin.
      Wyco is a place I’d would like to live but it’s just taxed so high on everything. Somebody please tell me why we have to let this continue? It’s just not right for the people of K C Ks to continue to live in the highest taxed County in Kansas!!
      Let’s stop this tax problem now!!!

  2. Mill Levy Decrease with Property Value increase and we are still paying more that we should but apparently that’s not enough. Lets add to our sales tax so we can encourage spending within our county and stop people from going to other counties to save money. People of Wyandotte county just keep supporting this type of behavior and then cant figure out what’s wrong.

  3. The price of the property dad bought in 1971 here in kcks adjusted to present day purchasing power of 2022 equals a fair amount pertaining to value yet the wyco 2022 appraised amount is $56,447.33 higher than the adjusted for inflation amount from 1971. So, subtracting $56,447.33 from what the 2022 adjusted for inflation value equates to be should be a fair amount of what the property is worth when it’s selling time for me. What would be really great is finding an idiot purchaser who will pay the wyco appraised amount assuming I can get that from them in the first place. Yes, my way of saying the taxes are too high here in kcks too.

  4. My own opinion on how this all got started is during the very late 1980/early 1990’s it seems some went out to obtain their realtors license and found they couldn’t really make any money selling houses. Weather or not one or two took a gamble to see what would happen if they just raised a reselling price to some ungodly amount to see what would happen or were just plain ordered to by someone else I can’t say but I do know how much a new home went for then and had an idea on how much a builder expected for profit after selling his new home or homes. This was Johnson Co. KS and Lee’s Summit, MO – somehow over the years it has just simply or not simply worked it’s way over to here after starting with greedy realtors and naive buyers elsewhere. Again, my own opinion.

Comments are closed.