Guest column: Re-entry Week: Beyond the prison gates

by Tom Beall, acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas

Each year, more than 600,000 individuals return to our neighborhoods after serving time in federal and state prisons, and another 11.4 million people cycle through local jails. Nearly a quarter of Americans have had some sort of encounter with the criminal justice system – mostly for relatively minor, non-violent offenses.

In law enforcement, we have a duty to make our criminal justice system fairer, more efficient, and more effective at reducing recidivism and helping formerly incarcerated individuals contribute to their community. That is why I am joining U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch in inviting Kansans to observe National Reentry Week during April 24 through April 30.

The U.S. Probation and Pretrial Services offices in Kansas work to assist people who have struggled with the laws and legal system. Any person convicted of a felony understands that nearly every aspect of life will be more difficult than before. Probation officers work with people on probation or supervised release, offering substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment, assistance finding housing or employment or both, educational opportunities or other life-changing programs. For anyone willing to make the effort, probation officers and staff are ready and willing to help. Likewise the federal Bureau of Prisons in Kansas works to provide drug treatment, vocational training and other programs aimed at reducing recidivism.

At the Department of Justice, supporting successful reentry is an essential part of our mission to promote public safety. By helping individuals return to productive, law-abiding lives, we can reduce crime across the country and make our neighborhoods better places to live. I am proud of the strides we have made and I will continue to support and advance reentry programs that promote opportunity and give formerly incarcerated individuals a better chance to rejoin our communities.

Tom Beall is the Acting United States Attorney for the District of Kansas.

Kansas had similar populist problems 120 years ago

Views
Opinion column

by Murrel Bland

About 120 years ago, William Allen White, the editor of the Emporia Gazette, wrote a very outspoken editorial entitled “What is the Matter with Kansas?” This commentary helped make the young Kansas editor a national authority on politics.

I have read this editorial many times during the past 60 or so years. And it always amazes me how White’s words continue to be relevant, particularly today.

White was a progressive Republican from an upper-middle class background. His father was a medical doctor and his mother was a schoolteacher. He was very much involved in policy making for the Kansas and national Republican Party. Before he borrowed money to buy the Gazette, he wrote editorials for The Kansas City Star.

I spent much of last Thursday and Friday last week at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, attending the annual meeting of the William Allen White Foundation. Journalists from across the country—mostly with a KU connection– come to Mt. Oread annually to pay tribute to the famous Emporia editor, and to community journalism.

Get a bunch of editors together, and most often the discussion turns to politics. And last week was certainly no exception. The keynote speaker at the meeting was Jerry Seib, the Washington bureau chief of The Wall Street Journal. Seib’s wife is Barbara Rosewicz who grew up in Kansas City, Kan.; she works for the Pew Charitable Trusts. Both are very loyal Jayhawks.

I asked Seib to compare the populist movement of White’s era to the Tea Party crowd of today. He said there certainly are similarities—however he said the populist movement of today is much more pronounced and considerably wider than during White’s day. Seib said the media and Donald Trump largely underestimated the extent of today’s populist success.

Seib said he does not expect Trump to have enough delegates to receive the nomination before the Republican National Convention convenes in July in Cleveland, Ohio. And if he gets the nomination, he said Trump will take other persons’ money. So far Trump has said he has self-financed his campaign.

Political pundits have speculated it will be Trump who will face Hillary Clinton in the November general election. Seib didn’t neccearily disagree with that prediction. However, he said one of Clinton’s biggest problems is a matter of voter trust.

White complained about the populists’ lack of political leadership in his famous editorial—of running an “old jay” for governor; a “failed businessman” for Congress; and “a kid without a law practice” for attorney general. White just as well could have been talking about today here in Kansas and elsewhere.

White concluded there really wasn’t anything that was wrong with Kansas that Kansans couldn’t solve. Despite White’s heavy use of sarcasm, he made a very valid point. The solutions to the problems of the day rested from within–with Kansans. That remains true today.

Last Saturday morning I heard more about the problems that the state of Kansas faces as Gov. Sam Brownback juggles state finances to find ways to balance the budget. State Rep. Louis Ruiz, D-31st Dist., delivered information straight from the state Democratic Party playbook, telling how Gov. Brownback is pilfering money from the highway fund and delaying payments to the state employees’ pension fund. He urged those who attended a legislative coffee at the West Wyandotte Library to vote for Democrats.

Rep. Ruiz also took a healthy swipe at State Sen. Steve Fitzgerald, R-Fifth Dist., and urged his defeat as he is one of Gov. Brownback’s most loyal disciples.

The League of Women Voters from Johnson County and the Kansas City, Kan., Chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People sponsored the meeting. About 40 persons, including a few public officials and those seeking public office, attended.

State Rep. Kathy Wolfe Moore, D-36th Dist., was less partisan than Rep. Ruiz. She said she didn’t care if potential candidates were Democrats or moderate Republicans—just as long as they were responsible.

Rep. Moore said that Gov. Brownback’s experiment of 2012 that eliminated income taxes on small businesses was a failure and caused the budget crisis.

Previously Kansas has had a balance among three taxing sources—property, income and sales. The often-cited analogy has been to a three-legged stool. Take one of those legs off and the stool collapses.

Rep. Moore said people come to Kansas because quality of life issues such as good schools. Kansas is not Florida or Nevada where there is no income tax; however substantial tourism generates considerable sales tax offsetting the need for income tax.

State Sen. Jim Denning, R-8th Dist., from Overland Park, in an interview on KCUR-FM Sunday, April 17, said Gov. Brownback may be changing his stance on the income tax on small businesses. Previously the governor said that reinstating this tax was not an option.

The legislators will go back to Topeka Monday, April 25, for the “veto” session. The session is not expected to last that long. The real action will happen after the Kansas Supreme Court rules whether the school finance legislation is equitable. Oral arguments on this case will start Tuesday, May 10, in Topeka. After the court acts, a special legislative session is expected.

Gov. Brownback and ultra-conservative legislators have been at odds for some time with Kansas courts; they are upset with previous rulings on school funding.

Rep. Ruiz warned that these conservatives will be supporting efforts to oust four justices from the Supreme Court. The governor could then appoint conservatives such as he did with Caleb Stegall. The four justices considered vulnerable are Lloyd Nuss, the chief judge, Carol Beier, Dan Biles and Marla Luckert; Rep. Ruiz urged voters to approve retaining these four judges.

State Rep. Stan Frownfelter, D-37th Dist., said he was disappointed because Gov. Brownback vetoed a bill that he had worked on for several years—it would make it easier for city or county government to deal with blighted property. Rep. Frownfelter said the governor killed the bill because he was upset with other actions of Democrat legislators in general rather than the specifics of this issue.

However, in a letter to the editor of The Kansas City Star Sunday, April 17, Gov. Brownback said he vetoed the bill because it allowed “local officials unrestricted power to choose which properties could stay and which they could take.”

Call them ultra-conservatives, Tea Party sympathizers or populists. They are a force today as they were 120 years ago in William Allen White’s day. Eventually a democracy will cleanse itself and more reasonable people will prevail as White suggested.

Murrel Bland is the former editor of The Wyandotte West and The Piper Press. He is the executive director of Business West.

Partisan differences shown at legislative meeting

Views
opinion column
by Murrel Bland

State Sen. Steve Fitzgerald (R-Fifth Dist.) admitted that he wasn’t very comfortable being outnumbered by three Democrats.

Sen. Fitzgerald was the lone Republican on a legislative panel that made presentations Friday, April 8 at a meeting of the Legislative Committee of the Kansas City, Kansas, Area Chamber of Commerce at the Community College. About 30 persons attended.

Sen. Fitzgerald, a conservative who is considered an ally of Gov. Sam Brownback, explained his support of House Bill 2655 that addresses equitable funding for school districts. Both the Kansas House and Senate approved the bill; Gov. Brownback signed the bill into law Thursday, April 7.

The bill, which had overwhelming Republican support, uses a formula that reduces state aid to most of the state’s 286 school districts and then redistributes funds back to districts making certain that no district sees a reduction. Overall funding was flat.

Democrats including those on the panel—State Reps. Tom Burroughs (33rd Dist.), Kathy Wolfe Moore (36th Dist.) and State Sen. Pat Pettey (Sixth Dist.) —were critical of the bill. That is consistent with Democrat leadership in the Legislature that has said the bill will allow wealthier school districts, such as Blue Valley, to raise property taxes to increase school budgets. That would put the Kansas City, Kan., School District at a disadvantage as it has substantially less of a tax base.

Rep. Burroughs, who is the minority leader in the Kansas House, agreed that the bill means that rich districts will get richer and poorer districts will get poorer.

The action will shift to the Kansas Supreme Court who will begin to review the law on Tuesday, May 10, with oral arguments. The court has said that if it does not approve the new financing law by June 30, the schools could be shut down.

Sen. Fitzgerald said that five of the Supreme Court judges are up for retention this year. He said this could be a factor in their decision. The five are Lawton Nuss (Chief Judge), Marla Luckert, Carol Beier, Daniel Biles and Caleb Stegall.

Sen. Fitzgerald sponsored a bill that would reopen The Woodlands to horse racing. It has passed the Senate and now needs approval in the House. The bill would change the amount of the wagering revenue that The Woodlands could keep. Those affiliated with Hollywood Casino said such a provision violates the development agreement that it has with the state of Kansas and the Unified Government. A direct mail card accuses Phil Ruffin, the owner of The Woodlands, of not having a development agreement with The Unified Government. The mailer also said if The Woodlands reopens, it would threaten jobs at Hollywood and annual contributions that go to charities.

Sen. Fitzgerald said that horse racing benefits several persons across the state of Kansas and would bring people with money to spend to Wyandotte County. He said Hollywood Casino would benefit.

Rep. Moore said she is neutral on whether or not to support The Woodlands. She did say, however, that before she could support The Woodlands, she would have to see a development agreement that would benefit the Unified Government.

The panel did agree on one measure that had bi-partisan support—a new juvenile justice law. This would allow for young nonviolent offenders to be directed to community-based programs rather than being jailed with hardened criminals. The economics of this new law make sense. It costs about $90,000 a year to keep a person in prison; a community based program could cost as little as $5,000 annually.

Legislators will return to Topeka Monday, April 25, after a spring recess.

Murrel Bland is the former editor of The Wyandotte West and The Piper Press. He is executive director of Business West.