Column: Moderate legislators may provide tax solutions

Rep. Pam Curtis, D-32nd Dist., right, and Rep. Val Winn, D-34th Dist., left spoke at a legislative forum Saturday at the Main Kansas City, Kan., Public Library. The forum was sponsored by the library, League of Women Voters and NAACP. (Photo by Mary Rupert)

Views
Opinion column

by Murrel Bland

“When anything is going to happen in this country, it happens first in Kansas.” – William Allen White, editor of The Emporia Gazette, 1922.

The above quote is from an editorial written by the famous small-town editor who had a tremendous influence on this country nationally. I couldn’t help but recall that passage when I attended a couple of legislative meetings last week. One was sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce Friday, Feb. 10, and the other was sponsored by the League of Women Voters Saturday, Feb. 11.

State Rep. Pam Horton Curtis (D-32nd Dist.) was at both meetings and talked about what she sees as a possible solution to the money woes that the state of Kansas is facing. Let’s fast-forward 95 years from 1922 when White wrote this commentary to today. Maybe Kansas has found a way out of its fiscal problems and could be an inspiration for other states who have similar challenges.

In White’s era, there was a great hue and cry from the Populist movement. White was aware of these folks, but didn’t have much use for them. Today, we have the Tea Party crowd — people who remind me of the Populists of yesterday. These folks have few solutions to complex problems. Their only answer to any given issue is “No.” Several Kansas candidates promoting this ultra-conservative anti-government approach were defeated last year. This ultra-right frustrated political crowd is the one that elected President Donald J. Trump.

But there has been a change in Kansas, thanks to a serious effort to elect more moderate candidates to the Kansas Legislature. Rep. Curtis says the 60 new legislators, although they are having to go through a learning process, are mostly reasonable people who understand what must be done. Many of them come from Johnson County and understand that public education, particularly K-12, is what makes a community a good place to live. After all, Kansas doesn’t have mountains or seashores to attract people. But the state has always had good schools. State Sen. Pat Pettey, D-Sixth Dist., a former teacher in the Turner school district, points out that Kansas ranks tenth nationally in the quality of public education.

So what is the solution to the state’s money troubles? It is short some $350 million for the present fiscal year and another estimated $600 million short for the next two fiscal years. Rep. Curtis believes it may be in a bill voted out of the House tax committee Thursday, Feb. 9, that would keep the bottom income tax rate at 2.7 percent, a midway rate of 5.25 percent and a top rate of 5.45 percent. The bill would also close the “LLC” loophole that lets business owners escape paying any state income tax.

Rep. Curtis says this bill could cause some pain for individual taxpayers and mean less money for schools. But she said would be a necessary move to help the state’s financial problems.

The unknown factor in state finance is still unknown — how will the Kansas Supreme Court rule concerning the adequacy of school finance. Education presently accounts for about 60 percent of the funds that the Legislature appropriates.

Maybe Kansas has found the solution and, like in William Allen White’s era, can be a national model. Maybe we are seeing the folly of Trump’s anti-government tactics play out every day on television. Maybe Kansas, with a more moderate approach, can lead the way for other states. But even if this current income tax bill gets through the Kansas House, it would have to pass the Kansas Senate. Then it would have to meet with the Gov. Sam Brownback’s approval or have enough votes to withstand his veto.

What Rep. Curtis offers this session is hope—something that wasn’t there last session. New faces in the Kansas Legislature have engendered this hope.

Murrel Bland is the former editor of The Wyandotte West and The Piper Press. He is the executive director of Business West.

Legislative update from Rep. Pam Curtis, D-32nd Dist.

Rep. Pam Curtis

by State Rep. Pam Curtis, D-32nd Dist.

It was another busy week at the Capitol. Committees continue to meet and they are starting to hear and work more and more bills.

There were many familiar faces from home the past week as organizations held Legislative Action Days, attended hearings and provided testimony on important issues. I love seeing people from home and so appreciate the involvement from our community in matters before the Kansas Legislature – it is important and it does make a difference.

It remains an incredible honor to represent our community in the Kansas House of Representatives. While the Legislature is in session, I do my best to stay in touch and keep you informed by email, and I spend countless hours every week helping my constituents solve problems. If I can be of service to you or anyone you know please call my office at 785-296-7371 or email me at [email protected].

You can also follow the legislative session online at www.kslegislature.org

Campus carry bill: Dead in Senate Committee, House hears testimony

Tuesday, the Senate Federal and State Committee voted on Senate Bill 53, which would grant universities, hospitals, and other state buildings exemption from the concealed carry law set to take effect in July 2017. SB 53 died in the committee on a voice vote.

On Wednesday, Feb. 1, the House Federal and State Committee heard testimony regarding HB 2074, legislation very similar to SB 53. The House committee vote has not yet been scheduled. Here is a link to the bill: http://kslegislature.org/li/b2017_18/measures/documents/hb2074_00_0000.pdf.

Kansas jobs report
Thursday, Feb. 2, the U.S Bureau of Labor Statistics released its jobs report. As of December 2016, Kansas had 9,300 fewer jobs than in December of 2015 – meaning that our state is experiencing negative job growth. Compared to the rest of the United States, Kansas has the fifth-worst job growth rate.

Bills on the House floor
Bills that hit the House floor this past week are as follows:
HB 2002: An act concerning the division of post audit; relating to purposes for which expenditures may be made by the division; exemption (Passed)
HB 2006: An act concerning counties; relating to the expansion of the board of county commissioners (Passed)
HB 2038: An act concerning business entities; relating to fees for certain filings with the Secretary of the State; exemption for certain veterans and current members of the armed forces (Passed by voice, failed on final action. The bill will now go back to committee.)

Native American legislators day
Wednesday, Feb. 1, was Native American Legislators Day. Rep. Ponka-We Victors helped to organize a celebration in the Capitol. Traditional music and dance was on display on the 2nd floor, featuring members of the Prairie Band Potawatomie Boys and Girls Club Dance Troupe. Other events throughout the day were sponsored by the Four Tribes of Kansas, which include Prairie Band Potawatomie, Kickapoo of Kansas, the Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska, and the Sac and Fox Nation of Kansas.

Medicaid expansion hearings scheduled
The House Health and Human Services Committee will hold hearings on HB 2064 KanCare Bridge to expand Medicaid. The hearings are open to the public and will be held at 1:30 p.m. in Statehouse Room 112-N. The schedule is as follows:
Feb 6th Hearing: HB 2064 – Neutral testimony from policy experts
Feb 8th Hearing: HB 2064 – Proponents testify
Feb 9th Hearing: HB 2064 – Opponents testify

Here is a link to the bill: http://kslegislature.org/li/b2017_18/measures/hb2064/.

Opinion column: Why the travel ban bothered me

Window on the West
Opinion column

by Mary Rupert

Under a presidential order, travelers were banned from seven countries, predominantly Muslim, from entering America on Jan. 27. Even those who were legally traveling with a work visa were not allowed into the country. The ban was overturned on Friday by a federal court order. The administration is appealing it.

As I see it, the argument is should you block everyone from certain countries from entering the nation in order to catch a couple of possible would-be criminal terrorists, or should you let in everyone with visas and correct papers in order, just screening them.

I personally have always been against punishing an entire group for the actions of a few. The American system calls for the assumption of innocence until proven guilty, not the assumption of guilt. An individual should be held responsible for his own actions; the group should not be held responsible for an individual’s actions.

But a travel ban on everyone from a certain country, or everyone who belongs to a certain religion, including those who have work visas, could block medical doctors who are coming back to their jobs here after being abroad, or well-respected professors, business owners, researchers or religious leaders who are anything but terrorists, and who have no record of violence in their pasts. The overwhelming majority of international students at American colleges are upstanding people of good character.

There were also refugees who were affected by the travel ban. The overwhelming majority of the refugees are fleeing for their lives to find a safe and peaceful place to live.

The ban has been costly to America’s image as a place that welcomes immigrants – and the ban had the ring of prejudice based on a religious preference.

In fact, this ban reminds me of a prejudice or redlining sometimes found in other areas of Kansas against Wyandotte County residents on the basis of their place of residence. Some small-town authorities have been known to be suspicious of big-city residents – when, of course, we who live here believe that at least 95 percent of us are good, upstanding people.

Clearly, if it is necessary to increase security in America, some other method must be employed that evaluates each person, and does not discriminate against persons because of their country of origin or religion. That method must be legal and ethical.

America has been enriched by immigrants throughout its history, and it continues to benefit from some of the smartest and best people in the world who come here to study and work on research, and others who spend their money at our tourist locations. It’s not fair to blame all international visitors for a few who are a problem.

To reach Mary Rupert, editor, email [email protected].