New South Patrol station hits a snag

Nobody wants extra property at former Superfund site

Plans to build a new South Patrol police station in Kansas City, Kan., hit a delay on Monday night at a standing committee meeting at City Hall.

The 9-acre site is near 2200 Metropolitan next to the new Walmart in Argentine. The value of the property was estimated by the developer at $1.66 million, according to the UG.

The UG Commission approved the new South Patrol facility in October of last year with a proposed location on the old Kansas City Structural Steel site in Argentine. In December the commission authorized $1.85 million in general obligation debt for the 10,000-square-foot police station, but according to the UG, it has not specifically authorized the site location.

At the Public Works and Safety Standing Committee Monday evening, Unified Government Administrator Doug Bach said the UG was only going to use a couple or three acres for the police station, and had planned on that, but the developer now wants to give the whole nine acres to the UG. It represents a change from what the UG had originally thought, according to Bach. The site is a former Superfund site that has the approval of the Environmental Protection Agency for this police station project.

Dirt from the contaminated fill area has been placed on part of that parcel. The site has been capped, according to Bach. The EPA has said it is safe for people who would work at the patrol station, according to UG officials. But it would not be approved for a children’s playground or public park.

The property is owned by Argentine Retail Developers Inc., which proposed to donate it to the UG, according to the UG. Listed in the secretary of state’s records as the office address for the company is Columbus, Kan., and the corporation officers include Hunter Harris, who is a partner in Lane4 Property Group; and with the board of directors is Ivan Crossland Jr., who is the chief executive officer of Crossland Construction Co.

“I don’t want that property; I don’t feel like we should take that property, but the developer in working this has said, look, if we’re going to donate the property, you take it all. That’s a little bit different when you look at it,” Bach said.

“What’s the long-term liability – it’s kind of unknown,” he said. It changed the deal a little bit, he said.

The UG would be able to leverage all the TIF (tax-increment financing) dollars to pay for the patrol station, according to Bach, making the project much cheaper to build at that location.

Jeff Bryant, a Public Works and Safety committee member, said he would be concerned about what might happen 35 to 50 years down the road, when something like a water main might break on the property, with water migrating outside the property. The UG might be responsible for contamination leaving the property, he said.

Commissioner Jane Philbrook was concerned about the UG accepting responsibility for former Superfund properties and how it could affect the UG in the future, plus what were the chances of the UG’s liabilities.

Bach said he had no concerns about the site; that the EPA approved it and put restrictions on it such as no parks. The developer may want to turn the extra property over to the UG because the developer would not have to spend money on, or do anything with it, in the future, he said. Also, the part of the highest elevation may have some sort of liability for the future, he said.

Bynum said she would be in favor of going ahead with the deal with just the three acres the UG needed, not the nine acres. “I want a project there to work,” she said.

The committee voted 4-2 against accepting the whole nine acres, with Jeff Bryant, Jane Philbrook, Harold Johnson and Melissa Bynum voting no. Voting yes were Angela Markley and Mike Kane.

The next step, Bach said, would be to discuss the project with the developer again and see if they can make additional progress on it. The UG would still like to do the deal but would like to do it without that extra parcel in its ownership, he said.

UG discussion gets heated over Community Development block grant funds

The heat index was 100 degrees outside on Thursday when the Unified Government Commission was meeting at City Hall, and the atmosphere inside was even hotter when the group discussed Community Development Block Grant funding.

The commission has been discussing shifting from using CDBG funds for predominantly emergency home repairs to a project-based investment focused on larger expenditures, such as building new housing for low-income residents.

The UG Commission was discussing reducing CDBG funding $400,000 for home repairs to $200,000. Under discussion was some of the home repair money going toward a redevelopment effort for the Highland Crest neighborhood to be done by Argentine Betterment Corp. During the meeting, the amount was changed to $300,000 for emergency home repairs, with six commissioners in favor.

ABC was the only agency that had submitted a bid for a new development effort, according to the commissioners. One of the issues raised at the meeting was whether other agencies knew that the UG might approve bids for new housing. Some commissioners stated that the bid process was open to everyone, and some agencies chose not to put in a bid this year. Mayor Mark Holland said that the year before, the UG CDBG fund received six requests and no grants were approved to the community agencies.

The commission took a straw poll Thursday evening that showed six commissioners in support of going ahead with the funding for the ABC project in Highland Crest, on the south side of Wyandotte County.

But before the meeting was over, heated words were flying back and forth.

“The optics don’t look good to me,” Mayor Mark Holland said. “How did ABC know there was going to be a change of paradigm that would free up $500,000? And if we changed the paradigm, aren’t we obligated to go back out to the public and say we changed the paradigm?”

According to sources, the mayor’s office has been handling a lot of complaint calls this week after his remarks at the National Council of La Raza convention were replayed on conservative websites, criticizing the mayor’s remarks.

Commissioner Angela Markley said ABC had no advance notice of the grant funding change, just the same information that all the other agencies had.

Commissioner Jane Philbrook said she had received several comments, and the process appeared “murky.” She said she was “deeply disappointed.”

“Appearances do matter in government, whether we like it or not,” Commissioner Philbrook said.

Commissioner Ann Murguia took exception with what she said was the implication of dirty politics.

Mayor Holland brought up that the application from ABC listed the Argentine Neighborhood Development Association as a partnering agency, and that Commissioner Murguia was the executive director of ANDA. He said Commissioner Murguia was advocating for the project without a recusal. He said he was “very concerned” about moving forward with it.

Commissioner Murguia stated that ANDA received no money from ABC and that ANDA was just providing free consulting and free advice to ABC. She did not believe there was a conflict of interest.

Commissioner Hal Walker said that other local groups have applied for CDBG funding for years and should know how to apply. Mayor Holland said it’s not surprising that the other groups didn’t apply if the previous year, there were no grants given out.

“There’s always sour grapes when somebody missed an opportunity,” said Commissioner Jim Walters, saying that processes were followed and approved, that there was an opportunity to reflect and make changes next year, and that the UG Commission needs to approve it and move on.

Walters added that someone once told him that “we spend more time talking about CDBG funds than we do about our $330 million budget.”

After the heated exchange, the commission took a straw poll, with six votes in favor, deciding not to go back to the other agencies and let them apply again, and to go forward with ABC receiving the $400,000 grant for the Highland Crest project.

A video of the meeting is on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIpZngG6ghw. The CDBG discussion starts at about 1:24 on the video, with some of the more heated moments starting at about 2:05 on the video.

UG Commission sets maximum mill levy rate above administrator’s proposal

The Unified Government on Thursday night set a maximum mill levy by one-half mill each for the city and county over the rate proposed by the administrator, while saying it was just for purposes of flexibility in handling the budget.

The move will give the UG the flexibility to shift costs back and forth from the city to the county and vice versa without having to republish the budget, according to the mayor. The budgeting process is different for the Unified Government, dealing with both the city and county budgets at the same time.

“No other city and county has a combined government in Kansas,” Mayor Mark Holland said at the meeting.

The UG did the same thing last year when it considered the budget, raising the amount from the administrator’s proposed budget when the commission set the maximum mill levy, then switching funds around and coming back to the original amount on the final budget vote.

The half-mill equals about $500,000 each, according to UG chief financial officer Lew Levin.

If the commission wants to move a tenth of a mill from the city budget to the county budget, or vice versa, it could still do that with the higher mill levy rate, UG Administrator Doug Bach said.

If the UG adopted the mill levy proposed earlier this week by the administrator, then it would not have the flexibility to move these items between budgets, he said. It would have to cut something and then move it between the budgets.

The commission is currently discussing changes to the proposed administrator’s budget in a series of workshops being held at City Hall. UG Commissioner Ann Murguia stated that while she is open to flexibility within the budget that the UG already has, she was not in favor of adding last-minute items because of emotional appeals.

Commissioner Hal Walker said the idea of commissioner initiatives should come earlier, and not later, in the process. He said he had a couple of ideas to present with some cost to them. He supports the commission deciding earlier in the process of whether some of the projects would move forward. Eleventh-hour ideas are generally smaller projects, Walker said, and sometimes there was not an opportunity to get a commission discussion or consensus on them earlier.

Mayor Holland agreed with working on commission initiatives earlier, and said the commission has done that, with the UG going over several commission ideas earlier.

The administrator’s proposed budget announced July 13 had a $323 million total, and an 82-mill rate for the combined city and county.

The Kansas City, Kan., proposed maximum mill levy was set at 43.973, a half-mill higher than the 43.473 mill rate proposed by the administrator earlier this week. The maximum mill rate for the county also was increased a half-mill to 38.988, increased from the original 39.488.

There was unanimous UG Commission approval of both changes.

The maximum mill levy for the downtown self-supported municipal improvement district was set at 12.500 mills. It is very little changed from the past two years. This applies to downtown Kansas City, Kan., and the district was started voluntarily by downtown merchants to provide extra services.

The public hearing date on the budget will be at 5 p.m. July 27 at the Commission Chambers, City Hall, 701 N. 7th St., Kansas City, Kan.

Budget documents are online at the UG’s website at www.wycokck.org, budget information is available at www.wycokck.opengov.com, and hard copies of the proposed budget are at the public libraries in Wyandotte County.

See earlier story at https://wyandotteonline.com/ug-property-tax-rate-proposed-to-remain-same-valuations-up-in-wyandotte-county/.