Rain, severe storms continue in Friday’s forecast

From 2 to 3 inches of rain are possible in Wyandotte County through Monday night, according to the National Weather Service. (National Weather Service graphic)
There is a slight chance of severe weather on Friday night in Wyandotte County. (National Weather Service graphic)

Rain continues in the forecast for Friday and the weekend, with severe storms possible, according to the National Weather Service.

From 2 to 3 inches of rain are expected through Monday night, the weather service said.

Wyandotte County is at a slight chance of severe weather Friday night, according to the weather service.

Damaging wind gusts, damaging hail and a few tornadoes cannot be ruled out of the severe storms late Friday night, the weather service said.

Flash flooding and river flooding also are possibilities in areas, according to the weather service.

Friday, there is a 40 percent chance of showers and thunderstorms, mainly before 10 a.m., the weather service said. The high will be near 76 with a south southeast wind of 8 to 17 mph, gusting as high as 30 mph. From a tenth to a quarter-inch of rain is possible.

Friday night, there is a 90 percent chance of showers and thunderstorms before 10 p.m., then showers and possibly a thunderstorm between 10 p.m. and 1 a.m., followed by a chance of showers and thunderstorms after 1 a.m., according to the weather service. The low will be around 57 with a south wind of 10 to 17 mph, gusting as high as 29 mph. Between a half and three-quarters of an inch of rain are possible.

Saturday, there is a 20 percent chance of showers and thunderstorms before 1 p.m., the weather service said. The high will be near 67. A west wind of 9 to 14 mph will increase to 15 to 20 mph in the afternoon, with winds gusting up to 29 mph.

Saturday night, it will be partly cloudy, with a low of 47 and a west wind of 9 to 14 mph, gusting as high as 24 mph, according to the weather service.

Sunday, it will be sunny, with a high near 68, the weather service said.

Sunday night, there is a 30 percent chance of showers after 1 a.m., according to the weather service. The low will be around 49.

Monday, there is an 80 percent chance of showers and a thunderstorm, the weather service said. The high will be near 66.

Monday night, there is a 60 percent chance of showers and possibly a thunderstorm before 1 a.m., according to the weather service. The low will be around 47.

Tuesday, it will be partly sunny, with a high near 64, the weather service said.

Tuesday night, there is a 30 percnet chance of showers, with a low of 48, according to the weather service.

Wednesday, there is a 60 percent chance of showers, with a high near 65, the weather service said.

Wednesday night, there is a 50 percent chance of showers, with a low of 48, according to the weather service.

Thursday, there is a 30 percent chance of showers, with a high near 63, the weather service said.

To keep up with the weather, visit www.weather.gov.

House passes compromise sports gambling legislation; bill’s fate rests with Senate

Proposal builds on controversial casino gambling law adopted in 2007

by Tim Carpenter, Kansas Reflector

Topeka — The Kansas House approved a compromise bill Thursday creating opportunities for tribal or state-owned casinos to engage in the business of online and in-person sports betting.

The measure would need to be adopted by the Kansas Senate before forwarded to Gov. Laura Kelly, who has expressed support for sports gaming in the past.

“I’ve got guarantees this will run in the Senate,” said Sen. Robert Olson, an Olathe Republican and lead Senate negotiator on the bill.

Rep. John Barker, R-Abilene, said the bill had bipartisan support and was an outgrowth of about five years of effort. The GOP-led chamber voted 73-49 to affirm the agreement reached by House and Senate negotiators.

Opponents questioned the wisdom of growing an industry that contributed to downfall of an estimated 65,000 problem gamblers in Kansas. They argued the 10% state tax on sports gambling generating $1 million to $5 million in annual revenue was an insufficient incentive to legalize the activity. The four state-affiliated casinos could make $9 million to $45 million annually on sports books.

“Those 65,000 gambling addicts in this state, we’re selling them out. That’s like dropping a bomb on those 65,000 families,” said Rep. Pat Proctor, a Leavenworth Republican who said he’d never bought a lottery ticket. “We have created this monster.”

Rep. Tom Burroughs, a Democrat from Kansas City, Kansas, said the state didn’t have the right to tell Kansans how or where they spent disposable income.

“We have gambling. We have the lottery. It doesn’t have the ill-fated consequence that many of you think it will bring forward,” Rep. Burroughs said.

Rep. Tory Awerkamp, R-St. Marys, said the Legislature should shelve the bill because it was crafted by casino companies or lobbyists. It would be better if the Kansas Lottery operated sports betting because the state would collect profits sought by the casinos, he said.

“It’s not something I think we should grow in Kansas, but if we do lets do it in a way that reflects the best interests of the people,” Rep. Awerkamp said.

The bill included a provision funneling 80% of state revenue from legal gambling on sports into a Kansas Department of Commerce fund that could be used to support establishment of a professional sports facility in Kansas. This section of Senate Bill 84 was intended to express support for movement of the Kansas City Chiefs across the state line from Kansas City, Missouri.

The state-owned casinos in Dodge City, Pittsburg, Mulvane and Kansas City, Kansas — established under control of the Kansas Lottery — would be permitted to operate sports books. Tribal casinos would be able to negotiate with state officials to engage in sports wagering.

Negotiators addressed a key obstacle by deleting a provision in the bill that contemplated Wichita businessman Phil Ruffin would compensate owners of Kansas Star Casino in Mulvane if a court determined initiating a system of betting on historic horse races at a Ruffin facility in Sedgwick County violated existing gaming agreements.

Under an earlier version of the sports betting bill, Ruffin would have made a payment of approximately $70 million to Kansas Star Casino to cover violations of existing agreements and Ruffin would be reimbursed through gaming revenues.

Ruffin’s representatives contend the financial arrangement was unnecessary because betting on historic horse races was legal under parimutuel law in Kansas, because these devices weren’t equivalent to slot machines.

Other states offering this form of horse-race gambling rely on video of thousands of past races to enable gamblers to place bets on the outcome.

Under the pending legislation, the Kansas Lottery and the Kansas Racing and Gaming Commission would share oversight of sports wagering. Each casino could operate up to three online sports wagering platforms. Betters on the casinos’ platforms would have to be physically located in Kansas to submit a wager.

The casinos could enter marketing agreements with professional sports franchises, including placement of kiosks at a team’s facility to allow fans to place bets. The casinos could enter marketing agreements with 50 businesses and entities, with one-fifth of the total reserved for nonprofit organizations. Sports gamblers involved in state-sanctioned betting would have to be 21 years old.

The bill would enable federally recognized Native American tribes to submit a request to the Kansas governor and Kansas Lottery director to operate a sports book “under the substantially same terms and conditions” applied to the state’s four casinos.

Kansas Reflector stories, www.kansasreflector.com, may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
See more at https://kansasreflector.com/2022/04/28/house-senate-prepare-for-votes-on-compromise-sports-wagering-legislation/

Apartment building near 6th and Central receives zoning approval

A controversial apartment highrise near 6th and Central received zoning approval at the Thursday night, April 28, Unified Government Commission meeting.

On an 8-1 vote, with Commissioner Christian Ramirez voting no, the UG Commission approved the zoning change for the building at 529 Central.

Opponents of the project turned out at City Hall to speak against the project. It was the first time in a couple of COVID years that the Commission Chambers had been reopened to the public.

The building, according to Gunnar Hand, director of planning and zoning, will be market-rate apartments that are eight stories high.

However, the apartments will look like they are six stories high because the top two stories will be set back from view, according to developers. That setback was one of several changes made by the developer, Sunflower Development Group, after some community opposition.

Parking was one concern of the residents, and the developer changed many of the two-bedroom units to one-bedroom units in order to reduce the number of parking spaces that will be needed. The number of units was reduced from 140 to 129, and now includes 18 studio apartments, 103 one-bedroom and eight two-bedroom units, according to developers, who said it would be a $40 million investment.

However, some residents who live in the Russian Hill neighborhood were not satisfied with those changes. Some of the businesses in that area sometimes refer to themselves as being in the Strawberry Hill area.

Rachel McMeachin, who owns the former Russian Orthodox Church building at the top of Russian Hill, and runs an aerial performance business from it, said the proposed apartment building would harm her home and business. It would be detrimental to her staying in business, she said.

Also, there would be undue hardships with traffic and parking, she believes.

The Watchdogs, a neighborhood group in the area, was not consulted about the project, according to a spokesman.

One resident, who lives in the Russian Hill neighborhood, talked about the greatly increased numbers of visitors and traffic that would be brought into the tiny Russian Hill streets.

Another resident said the streets in the area are very narrow and the emergency services have trouble with them currently. She believed that the influx of residents would make this worse. She also said that there were not enough procedures in place to listen to the Hispanic residents of the area.

Amber Lear, a resident, said some recent housing built on Strawberry Hill were not affordable unless people had a very high-paying job or more than one wage-earner was living at the residence. She noted she had two jobs and it was hard to find affordable housing.

“The gentrification of Strawberry Hill is a very big thing,” Lear said. She was concerned that people on fixed incomes, including retirees, might be pushed out of their homes.

The project did have the support of the Central Avenue Business Association, Strawberry Hill Neighborhood Association, the Wyandotte Economic Development Council, the Kansas City, Kansas, Area Chamber of Commerce and several businesses.

Mike Pierce, co-owner of the nearby Slap’s BBQ, said it was difficult to operate a restaurant because of the lack of traffic, and he was looking forward to the increased number of residents who would be in the area.

The owners of the nearby Chicago’s bar agreed. They have seen businesses in the area close, and they wondered how long they would have to drive the streets and see building after building with nothing in them.

Former state senator Chris Steineger also spoke in favor of the development. “Downtown needs a jump start,” he said, and this could be the first of several projects.

Daniel Parker, who lives in the project area, was in favor of the project, saying there were a lot of economic benefits to businesses and the community, and it would present the area well as a gateway to the city.


Opponents said they submitted petitions with almost 600 signatures against the project.

However, according to Misty Brown, chief UG attorney, it was not a valid protest petition. Hand said the UG originally validated the protest petition, the applicant appealed, it was reviewed by the legal department, which found some signatures invalid, making the petition invalid.

Commissioner Brian McKiernan tried to bring about a compromise between the residents and the developers. However, the developers did not want to accept R5 zoning, a compromise zoning change that would have allowed only four stories to the apartment building. Commissioners said, however, they would like to have the developer present such an option for a smaller building and discuss it.

Commissioner Christian Ramirez said while he thought the project could be catalytic for the area, it was not right for 6th and Central, where traffic could be congested.

The lengthy meeting is online at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOwcF1HC6Pc.