Consolidation proposed for homeless services in Wyandotte and Jackson counties

Just a few weeks after drop-in services ended for the mentally ill, including many homeless persons, at the Frank Williams Housing Resource Center in Kansas City, Kan., a proposal has been made to consolidate homeless services in Wyandotte County with Jackson County, Mo.

Wilba Miller, Unified Government community development director, said a merger is being proposed for the Wyandotte County and Jackson County Continuum of Care, to make a bistate regional program. She made her remarks at the UG’s Administration and Human Services Committee meeting Monday night.

“We are at a very exciting time and have a unique opportunity to take advantage of something only a few communities and continuums have done in the U.S.,” said Kerry Wrenick, who has worked with homeless youth and families in the Kansas City, Kan., Public Schools for about six years and is the chairperson of the Wyandotte Homeless Coalition Services board. She said she hoped to gain support for a bistate merger with the Continuum of Care in Jackson County, Mo.

The Continuum of Care is mandated by Housing and Urban Development and coordinates housing services for the homeless, Wrenick said. The Wyandotte Homeless Services Coalition manages about $1.5 million that comes into Wyandotte County to address the needs of the homeless, she said.

When the coordinator of the WHSC resigned last year, it gave the group an opportunity to evaluate the best approach to ending homelessness in the community, Wrenick said.

“We need an accountable, responsive infrastructure to address homelessness, that promotes collaboration and coordination,” she said.

Other goals the communities can agree on include the need for collaboration with nearby communities, the need to raise awareness for support to end homelessness, building support among elected officials, identifying partners and enhance connections with other community initiatives, and identify ways to track best practices that lend itself to design and implementation of an outcome-measurement process, she said.

Since August 2015, Wyandotte Homeless Services Coalition representatives have met with their counterparts in Jackson County to discuss a merger, she said. They also met with the local HUD office, which said it would like to see collaboration, she added.

The current workload to manage a COC handling $1.5 million is more than a single person can handle, Wrenick said.

“The overflow is burning out our volunteers, who need to focus on housing homeless individuals and families, and staff does not have the margin for systems change work that our new federal regulations are requiring,” Wrenick said.

That was noticed in a recent cutback in one of the homeless service providers in Wyandotte County, she said.

Another is a lack of a unified system and fluidity of those living in homeless situations. “They go back and forth across state lines,” she said. “That means absolutely nothing to our populations. So they are accessing resources wherever they can travel to. The state line has absolutely no relevance to them.”

Wrenick said the point in time count is submitted to HUD every year, but educational homeless youth are not included in that count. The count says there are about 100 homeless persons here, but more than 850 homeless youth are being served now in the Kansas City, Kan., Public Schools, she said. Last year there were about 1,400 youth served.

“Our numbers of family and youth is our fastest-growing population, where right now, funding is headed,” she said.

After wrapping up a focus on veteran and chronic homelessness in 2016, the next focus will be on children and families in 2020, she said.

Wrenick said the Kansas City, Kan., Public Schools had to budget about $500,000 last year to pay for transportation, and that service must be provided to the families.

She said consolidation is a good idea because Wyandotte County would have access to a fuller range of homeless services and better coordination. By pooling resources, Wyandotte County will have the ability to recruit and hire an exceptional leader; and it would be able to seek resources from private foundations and donors who require a collaborative and regional approach. The leader would be a single point of contact to engage new partners and engage connections with other community initiatives, she said.

Wrenick said she would like to submit the merger sometime in March to HUD, and have it completed by mid-summer.

Commissioner Melissa Bynum said she was concerned that after a merger, there might not be a Wyandotte County location and that it might be served in a marginal way. She wanted some reassurance that that would not happen.

Wrenick said current funded programs and agencies that receive HUD funding are not in jeopardy of losing their funding. Funding will remain as is as long as the program is able to meet its outcomes and is serving the population it is supposed to serve, she said.

Wrenick said Wyandotte County is not in jeopardy of losing current funded programs, she said.

Miller said if an application for one of the agencies is not approved, those funds might become available for anyone in the bistate area, and she was concerned about it. However, the coalition pointed out that a lot of the agencies already were bistate agencies, she said.

Wrenick said some of the issues have already been addressed in the new bylaws.

Commissioner Jane Philbrook said she would like to see the bylaws guarantee that the funds now here are not handed over to another group or area.

“The HMIS (Homeless Management Information System) is very, very important,” Commissioner Philbrook said. “That way, we’re not spending money two or three times, we know where the money’s going and we can help the people stay in that care.”

Commissioner Harold Johnson said it is vitally important to make sure there is a presence, whether bricks and mortar or human capital, in Wyandotte County. While he is an advocate for efficiencies, he wanted to reiterate what others had said, that he wanted Wyandotte County to be represented.

Wrenick said that has been included in the bylaws, and there will be three representatives from Wyandotte County and three from Jackson County to make up the board.

Cost of rejecting Medicaid expansion $1B and counting, Kansas hospitals say

by Jim McLean, KHI News Service

Kansas’ rejection of Medicaid expansion has cost the state more than $1 billion, according to the association that represents the state’s hospitals.

“This 10-figure sum represents a loss of nearly 11 Kansas taxpayer dollars every second since Jan. 1, 2014 — funds that go to the federal government to be spent in other states for Medicaid expansion,” the Kansas Hospital Association, which keeps a running total of the amount on its website, said in a news release issued Monday.

Since the start of 2014, when the main provisions of the Affordable Care Act took effect, 31 states and the District of Columbia have expanded Medicaid eligibility to all adults earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

The annual income limits in expansion states are $16,242 for an individual and $33,465 for a family of four. In Kansas, only adults with dependent children are eligible for KanCare, the state’s privatized Medicaid program, and then only if their incomes are below 28 percent of the poverty level, which for a family of four is $9,216.

Hospital officials say Medicaid expansion would provide coverage to approximately 150,000 Kansans, many of whom are now uninsured, and generate additional federal dollars for providers hit hard by reductions in Medicare reimbursements triggered by the ACA and a budget-cutting formula that congressional conservatives demanded.

But those arguments have so far failed to move the needle on the issue. So, this year, hoping to gain some traction, KHA introduced what its Bridge to a Healthy Kansas plan. It’s modeled after the so-called “red state” expansion plan crafted by conservative Republican Gov. Mike Pence in Indiana.

“The time has come for Kansas to move forward with a unique, Kansas based solution that uses federal funding to bridge our state’s health care coverage gap,” said Cindy Samuelson, a KHA spokesperson. “The Bridge to a Healthy Kansas is a fiscally responsible way to make health care affordable for more Kansans.”

The KHA proposal, like the Indiana plan, requires beneficiaries to pay a portion of their premiums and suspends coverage for those who fail to pay. Some Republicans in the Kansas Legislature who had opposed expansion have said they’re open to considering KHA’s new plan. But Gov. Sam Brownback and Republican legislative leaders remain opposed and appear determined to keep the issue from coming to a vote.

Over the weekend, the state committee of the Kansas Republican Party unanimously passed a resolution opposing expansion. It says that so-called “red state” expansion plans like Indiana’s merely “offer window dressing to disguise the expansion of Obamacare.” Because the federal government won’t allow states to require that Medicaid beneficiaries work, the resolution says even the expansion plans adopted in Republican-controlled states do little to promote “personal responsibility and self-reliance.”

Noting that enrollment has been higher than anticipated in expansion states, opponents also say they don’t believe the federal government can afford to permanently shoulder 90 percent of expansion’s costs as the ACA requires it to do.

At the halfway point of the legislative session, no hearings have been scheduled on KanCare expansion and two attempts to force floor votes on the KHA proposal have failed.

The nonprofit KHI News Service is an editorially independent initiative of the Kansas Health Institute and a partner in the Heartland Health Monitor reporting collaboration. All stories and photos may be republished at no cost with proper attribution and a link back to KHI.org when a story is reposted online.

– See more at http://www.khi.org/news/article/cost-of-rejecting-medicaid-expansion-1-billion-and-counting-kansas-hospital#sthash.H6yCZrBj.dpuf

Following the UG money distributions

Window on the West
Opinion column

by Mary Rupert

The Unified Government will be giving away more money and making decisions about spending or saving more money this year than in past years.

Here is an update on some of the funds expected to come in to the Unified Government.

CDBG and budget public hearing Thursday: Community residents traditionally turn out to tell the UG Commission, during a public hearing, about what they want in services and what is needed in their area. Community Development Block Grant funds are sometimes available for specific uses, and sometimes the UG will fund projects out of its regular budget.

The CDBG and budget public hearing will be held at 7 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 25, in the Commission Chambers, lobby level, City Hall, 701 N. 7th St., Kansas City, Kan. It is the first public budget hearing for the year. For more information on this meeting, see http://www.wycokck.org/uploadedFiles/Articles/Public%20Hearing%20Notice%202%2025%202016%20final.pdf.

Sales tax millions: Mayor Mark Holland has gathered information with town hall meetings in each commission district about what the residents want to see happen with the sales tax income anticipated to be about $12 to $13 million as the STAR bonds are completed in 2017 at the Legends Outlets. Businesses want to be part of the town hall process now. In March, more meetings are scheduled so that business representatives can comment on what they would like to see done with the money. (See below for details.)

$1.25 million in community charitable grant fund: The Hollywood Casino charitable grant funds of $500,000 are in a different category, outside the regular budget process. This year, the UG Commission decided to add $750,000 in a Schlitterbahn charitable contribution to the pot to make $1.25 million that commissioners will approve for charitable purposes in Wyandotte County.

In a compromise approved Feb. 4, the commission agreed to have the Greater Kansas City Community Foundation do more screening of applicants before they come back to the commissioners, who will make a final decision. Each commissioner (and the mayor) will control one-eleventh of the fund to give to charitable purposes this year.

Schlitterbahn proposal and potential conflicts of interest

In a letter accompanying its $750,000 charitable contribution, a Schlitterbahn owner asked that $500,000 go toward the downtown Healthy Campus project, $50,000 for the Urban Scholastic Center at at 29th and Minnesota, $50,000 to the West Kiwanis KCK Club, and the remaining $150,000 for the commission to decide.

The UG Commission did not approve that request on Feb. 4. Instead, all the money was placed together with the Hollywood Casino funds into a charitable contributions fund, with the UG Commission making the decision on how much recipients would receive.

That does not mean that the Healthy Campus, Kiwanis and Urban Scholastic Center will not be funded – they might be funded if they apply and if individual commissioners decide to allot funds to them.

Commissioner Ann Murguia on Feb. 4 stated that she checked the UG-Schlitterbahn development agreement about the contribution, and it stated the UG would make the decision on where the charitable funds will be spent. She said at the meeting that the UG Commission had been very intentional about making sure everyone has the same access to these charitable dollars, and that’s why she supported them going through the same application process as the other funds.

The $750,000 contribution is a one-time contribution including funds for past years, according to UG officials, as Schlitterbahn had signed an agreement some years ago with the UG to make an annual contribution. Next year’s Schlitterbahn contribution is expected to be about $100,000, UG officials said.

The commission had been split on how to handle the charitable contributions before a compromise was worked out. Commissioner Melissa Bynum did not support commissioners directly making the decisions on the funds. There also was some support for the former method of an advisory committee to make the preliminary decisions, which would then come to the commission for approval.

However, the commission changed that process previously after some other commissioners said their districts were being ignored and not receiving any of the funds.

Commissioners Bynum and Jane Philbrook said at the Feb. 4 meeting that they were members of the Kiwanis club mentioned in the Schlitterbahn letter, but they were not on the board of directors making decisions for that group.

That received a response from Commissioner Murguia, who was criticized last July by the mayor when her name appeared as an adviser to an Argentine group applying for CDBG funding. Commissioner Murguia told the two commissioners that she was “telling you as your friend” that it was very important that their names not appear on the application if the organization submits a request for funding.

Commissioner Hal Walker opposed the Healthy Campus receiving a $500,000 donation off the top of the $750,000 fund. He said the commission has already voted to give the Healthy Campus $6 million if it comes up with a matching amount in contributions. He said if the Healthy Campus comes within $500,000 of the amount it is trying to raise, he would vote to issue that much in additional debt for it.

“But this is money we can do more good with right now,” he said, referring to using the Schlitterbahn contribution money for smaller projects around the community.

To view the Feb. 4 meeting, visit this website: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UW67cXs19M.

To see the Hollywood Casino grant applications from last year, visit https://www.wycokck.org/uploadedFiles/Hollywood_Casino/Final%20Casino%20Grants%202015(1).pdf.

Business representatives scheduled to meet about STAR bond funds

The estimated $12-13 million becoming available to the UG in 2017 from sales taxes at The Legends Outlets have been the topic of the mayor’s town hall meetings, as well as a business meeting coming up in March.

Should they spend it on a landmark project such as the downtown Healthy Campus, or should it go back to the taxpayers as a reduction in property taxes? Should it be used to build a new juvenile jail or to build sidewalks? Should it be spent to satisfy a consent agreement with the U.S. Justice Department over the city’s stormwater and sewer management, or should it be put into the UG’s reserves to make their interest rates decrease when they borrow money? Will they upgrade the fire stations, or will they build new bike paths?

One thing is certain, the UG doesn’t support using its share of the STAR bond payoff windfall to fund the American Royal moving to Wyandotte County Park at Bonner Springs (near 126th and State), UG lobbyist Mike Taylor said last week. The UG would not be against the state of Kansas using its share of the sales taxes for the project, but that was opposed last week in the Legislature.

Business representatives here asked for a Listening Tour meeting for business, and one has been scheduled at 11:15 a.m. Thursday, March 10, at General Motors, Fairfax area of Kansas City, Kan., with the Fairfax Industrial Association as the sponsor. Another meeting was scheduled for 5 p.m. Wednesday, March 30, at the West Wyandotte Library, 1737 N. 82nd, with Business West as the sponsor.

Videos of the mayor’s Listening Tour in each commission district are online at http://www.wycokck.org/Listen/.

To reach Mary Rupert, editor, email [email protected].