Kansas Senate passes welfare restrictions

Democrats say colleagues don’t understand realities of poverty

by Andy Marso, KHI News Service

The Senate voted Wednesday to solidify policies restricting cash assistance to low-income Kansans over the objections of a senator who represents an urban district and other Democrats.

Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudeau, a Democrat from Wichita, said her Senate colleagues displayed ignorance of the realities of poverty in Kansas by passing House Bill 2258.

“We in this body think that people who are receiving welfare benefits are low-life people sitting home doing nothing,” Faust-Goudeau said. “The majority of those individuals are the working poor. They go to work every day, but they still qualify for those little benefits they receive.”

The chamber’s final vote on the bill could come Thursday.

Sen. Michael O’Donnell, a Republican from Wichita, carried the bill to the floor.
Among other measures, it would limit the amount of cash that recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families can withdraw each day, reduce lifetime benefits from 48 months to 36 months and restrict recipients from using their assistance cards for a long list of entertainment items, including theme parks and sporting events.

The bill also includes restrictions on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, commonly called food stamps. Some of the changes, including work and job training requirements, already were established by Gov. Sam Brownback’s administration through rules and regulations, but writing them into law would ensure future administrations could not change the policies without legislative approval.

O’Donnell and other supporters said the bill would prevent fraud and help recipients move off welfare and into the workforce.

“We’re trying to make sure these benefits are used the way they were intended to be,” O’Donnell said.

Faust-Goudeau and the chamber’s other Democrats slowed the bill’s passage by offering a host of amendments to do things like allow the secretary of the Department for Children and Families to extend the duration of benefits during times of economic recession and require annual reports on the success of the job training programs meant to help people off the TANF and SNAP rolls. The chamber’s Republican supermajority defeated the Democratic amendments one by one during a floor session that took most of the day.

But when one of the bill’s supporters, Parker Republican Sen. Caryn Tyson, offered an amendment to lower the daily ATM withdrawal limit even more — from $60 to $25 — it was adopted 23-14.

O’Donnell expressed some concern that most ATMs only distribute cash in multiples of $20 and asked Tyson what she thought about a $40 daily withdrawal limit.

But Tyson held firm at $25, saying the details could be ironed out by a conference committee with the House. O’Donnell voted for her amendment.

Faust-Goudeau expressed dismay at the $25 limit, asking her colleagues to consider the plight of constituents who do not have checking accounts and pay a portion of their rent and utilities by cashing in their assistance every month and then converting the cash into a money order.

She said she traveled with some TANF recipients one day to get a firsthand look at the steps involved.

“It’s a two-hour trip, and it’s not Gilligan’s Island,” Faust-Goudeau said. “It’s a two-hour trip on the bus just to get there, and then back home. So that’s four hours in that day.”

Faust-Goudeau questioned whether TANF recipients would even be able to afford the bus fare with a $25 withdrawal that would likely to be diminished by ATM fees.

She also asked her colleagues to remember that each of their districts contain TANF recipients and repeatedly said that a majority of adult TANF recipients are working but earning so little that they still qualify for help.

Some senators asked why TANF recipients were paying their rent and utilities in cash.
“Do we not encourage welfare recipients to get involved with a bank?” asked Sen. Ralph Ostmeyer, a Republican from Grinnell.

O’Donnell said each recipient is assigned a case worker to help with money management.
Senate Minority Leader Anthony Hensley, a Democrat from Topeka, offered an amendment to put the bill’s changes on hold pending a review from a social services advisory council that Gov. Sam Brownback established.

Hensley said he thought the bill, which also provides for voluntary photo identification cards for TANF recipients, might have some positive aspects. But he said it also likely would have some consequences his colleagues weren’t able to identify, and he thought the experts on the governor’s council would be better equipped to vet it.

“This bill contains a number of different social services policies that I’m not sure we as legislators can get our arms around and understand,” Hensley said.

Hensley’s amendment received only 10 votes.

While some supporters of the bill said a study of the TANF changes would be worthwhile after passing it, they said there should be no delay in approving the changes.

“Work lifts individuals out of poverty,” said Sen. Mary Pilcher-Cook, a Republican from Shawnee. “It lifts individuals out of depression, and it gives them a sense of self-worth.”

The number of TANF recipients in Kansas has dropped precipitously during Brownback’s tenure, from more than 40,000 to just under 15,000. Several nonprofit advocacy organizations say that’s mainly due to restrictions that have limited access to the program, pointing to data that shows poverty levels in the state have not fallen.

But the governor’s supporters cited job training programs and the 6,000 TANF recipients who found employment that paid enough to get off the program between December 2013 and December 2014 as evidence that the changes should be set in law as soon as possible.

The Senate smoothed the measure’s possible path to passage by placing it in a House bill.

The nonprofit KHI News Service is an editorially independent initiative of the Kansas Health Institute and a partner in the Heartland Health Monitor reporting collaboration. All stories and photos may be republished at no cost with proper attribution and a link back to KHI.org when a story is reposted online.

– See more at http://www.khi.org/news/article/senate-passes-welfare-restrictions#sthash.gni2YM3v.dpuf

Legislative update from Sen. Pat Pettey, D-6th Dist.

Sen. Pat Pettey
Sen. Pat Pettey

As always, it is an honor to represent District 6 in the Kansas Senate. If I can be of service to you or anyone you know, call my office at 785-296-7375, or email me at [email protected] or feel free to visit me in 125-E at the Kansas statehouse.

In this issue:
• Senate passes budget
• Governor signs block grant bill
• Proposed school finance formula
• Eliminating conceal carry permit
This is the last week before first adjournment of the 2015 session. They have changed the start of the veto session to April 29. That gives the budget committees more time to work through the new revenue estimates and finalize things.

Senate passes budget

Last week the Senate passed a budget for the 2016 and 2017 fiscal years. HB 2135 spends over $6.4 billion each of the next two years. This was about $70 million more in spending than the governor requested. However, revenues are projected to be $5.8 billion. If you look at the Senate budget on paper, it shows an ending balance of $72 million for 2016 and $164 million for 2017. But that’s all smoke and mirrors.

The budget they passed includes $400-$500 million of new revenues that have not yet been approved. It includes fees charged to medical providers that are not approved yet. It does not include the fact that we are $38 million behind projected revenues for this year and revenues continue to decline. It shows income from KPERS bonding that is not yet approved and overstated at that.

The budget also includes hundreds of millions of dollars of “one-time” fixes like borrowing from KDOT. The bottom line is the budget passed is not sustainable or constitutional.

Here are some budget details:

Both the House and Senate start with the governor’s recommendations from back in January and make their own adjustments. Each house passes a budget then they conference to work out the differences. Here are some items from the Senate bill:

• They cut funding for K-State by over $3 million and KU by over $4 million. Pittsburg State gets an extra $1 million for its school of transportation and Ft. Hays gets $16 million for a new Institute of Applied Technology building.
• Major changes are made to the comprehensive grant program that provides $16 million in scholarships to Kansas students. Today $8 million goes to students attending private universities in Kansas and $8 million to students attending public universities. In the Senate budget, $13.3 million goes to private university students and $2.4 million to public university students. Here is how many public university scholarships will be lost: 915 at K-State; 880 at KU; 560 at Wichita State; 245 at Washburn University; 260 at Emporia State; 315 each at Ft. Hays and Pittsburg.
• They cut the Children’s Initiatives Fund by about $5 million, mostly in the area of reading programs.
• The Senate added $3 million to hire a consultant to do a study on how to make state government more efficient. There was an amendment to remove that study funding, with opponents saying we have had other studies we ignored. The money stayed in the budget.

Added $4.3 million for Hepatitis C medications for Medicaid patients. One of the key factors in the budget it trying to figure out Medicaid caseload growth and how to fund care.


What’s next? Why should you care?

I wanted you to know the “big picture” about the Senate budget (that is, it is out of balance and unsustainable) because here is what could happen next. The House has its own budget bill, but can choose just to adopt the Senate budget by a “vote to concur” and not debate its own budget. That vote could happen early this week.

The problem is that the House has some things in its budget that the Senate doesn’t and vice versa. For example, Gov. Brownback introduced a program a couple of years ago to give school districts funding for providing training in high school for technical trade certifications. Thousands of students have participated in this program and school districts have been growing the program to help students be career and college ready. This money was scrapped in the Senate budget, but kept in the House budget. They should have to confer and agree on the best path, not just take the easy way out with a budget that cannot be sustained.

Another issue is the funding of the judiciary. The Senate budget includes no funding for the judiciary, hoping they can bully the judiciary into voting against public education to keep its funding. The budget should reflect our priorities, and this one does not.

Governor signs block grant bill
Gov. Brownback signed a bill last week that eliminates the school finance formula and allocates a block grant to school districts for the 2016 and 2017 school year. My Senate district encompasses all or part of 5 school districts. Here is how they are negatively impacted for the 2014-15 school year:
Kansas City, Kan., Public Schools, USD 500- $1.9 million dollars less
Turner District 202- $339,000 dollars less
Piper District 203- $340,000 dollars less
Shawnee Mission District 512- $1.2 million dollars less
Bonner Springs District 204- $83,000 dollars less
They all will have a greater impact in the next two years as the district’s needs grow. Our schools are already underfunded and this bill exacerbates the problem by removing necessary weightings.

Want to get active?

There are a couple of groups trying to raise awareness by having grassroots rallies at the Capitol this week.

• Game on for Kansas Schools did a 60-mile walk from Kansas City to Topeka to bring awareness to the school funding issue. There was a rally Monday, March 30, at the Capitol. A dozen people made the 66-mile walk from Merriam to the Capitol starting on Friday. Over 75 Kansans joined them in Topeka on Monday. You can check them out at Game on for Kansas Schools.org or like them on Facebook.

• Kansas Action for Children, KNEA, Citizens for the Arts, Women for Kansas and several other organizations gathered at the capitol on Wednesday, April 1, to bring awareness to the state revenue situation. There was a rally in the capitol. They want to bring awareness to the impact of falling revenues on the state. See http://www.khi.org/news/article/kansans-rally-for-repeal-of-brownback-tax-cuts.

Proposed school finance formula
The Senate Education Committee held hearings two days last week on a proposed school finance formula introduced by Sen. Steve Abrams, R-Arkansas City. Senate Bill 294 relies on a per-pupil-based funding system with funding starting at $3,820 for each student. This is $32 less than the current base state aid per pupil. The formula then includes supplemental aids based on poverty, sparsity, pensions, equalization, enrollment, and success. The success portion would require districts to keep track of where students are two years after graduation. Many criticized the current formula for being too complicated, but this bill takes that concern to a new height.

If passed, the formula would be applied to the six innovative districts for the 2015-2016 school year. Then, it would apply to 100 school districts selected by the State Board of Education for the 2016-2017 school year. By the third year, it would be implemented for every district in the state.

There is still a lot unknown about this bill, and with just a week left of regular session, there is not enough time to thoroughly vet a new school finance formula.

Eliminating conceal carry permits
One of the more controversial bills passed last week would remove Kansas’ permit requirements for individuals carrying a concealed firearm. the state’s permit process includes training and an extensive application and background check. The requirements ensure that certain core public safety standards are preserved when people are carrying hidden, loaded guns in public places. As a proponent of the Second Amendment, I am in favor of common sense gun laws, but allowing anyone to carry a gun without adequate training or a background check threatens the safety of our communities. The bill will now go to the governor for his signature.

Police investigate aggravated burglaries

Kansas City, Kan., police are investigating four aggravated burglaries in the 3100 block of Woodview Ridge Drive, a police spokesman said.

In three of four cases, the victims have been assaulted, the spokesman said.

The victims have only been able to describe the suspects as male, police said.

The suspect or suspects are entering through the balcony door on both upper and lower levels, and exiting through the residence front door, the spokesman said.

The Kansas City, Kan., Police Department is encouraging all residents to secure their homes at all times, the spokesman said.

The incidents are under investigation by the Kansas City, Kan., Police Department’s Criminal Investigations Division, which is encouraging anyone with information to call the TIPS hotline at 816-474-TIPS.