Cannabis oil bill passes House committee

Bill amended to tighten restrictions on THC, qualifying health conditions

by Andy Marso, KHI News Service

For the first time, a Kansas House committee has approved a bill allowing some form of medical marijuana.

House Bill 2282 was limited in scope to begin with, and Rep. John Wilson, the bill’s sponsor, proposed amendments to further limit it Monday in the hopes of assuaging concerns about opening the state to legal pot abuse.

The effort worked, and Wilson’s bill passed the House Health and Human Services Committee verbally with only a few “nay” votes. Wilson, a Democrat from Lawrence, said the somewhat anti-climactic vote was appropriate.

“We don’t celebrate the passage of other medical or patient-focused bills in here, and I think this is just another one of those bills,” he said. “It just happens to deal with a plant that has a history behind it.”

Since introducing the bill last month, Wilson sought to separate it from much broader medical marijuana bills introduced by fellow Democrats in the House and Senate.

He stressed that his bill allows only the use of cannabis too low in THC to provide a “high” and only for the treatment of seizure disorders.

“I’m not a foot soldier in any march toward full-scale legalization, recreational marijuana or anything like that,” Wilson said. “Our bill is structured in such a way that if people want to add any new conditions or any new variety or marijuana or new levels of THC, they’re going to have to come to the Legislature first.”

He said the bill as written could appeal to a unique coalition of libertarian-leaning Republicans or those looking to assert states’ rights, as well as progressive Democrats who think marijuana is a safe alternative to traditional drugs.

There is anecdotal evidence that low-grade cannabis oil can reduce the harmful symptoms for children with disorders that cause them to suffer dozens or even hundreds of seizures a day. The most well-known anecdote involves Charlotte Figi, whose treatment success caused supporters to name the treatment “Charlotte’s Web.” But formal research on the treatment’s risks and rewards has been limited due to the federal government’s classification of marijuana as a Schedule One controlled substance.

Still, in recent years almost half the states have adopted some sort of legal access to cannabis oil.

Wilson’s bill, as amended, stipulates that unless the Legislature says otherwise, the oil in question must be made with marijuana that contains no more than .3 percent THC, a level low enough to have basically no intoxicating effect. It also limits its usage strictly to those with a documented seizure disorder.

Wilson’s amendment scuttled a process to petition KDHE for other THC content and for treatment of other disorders, and eliminated an advisory committee that would have been created to evaluate those petitions.

The bill as previously written drew opposition from law enforcement and addiction treatment groups who said the petition process created a gaping loophole.

Rep. Dick Jones, a Republican from Topeka, said he still believed the amended bill would put Kansas on a slippery slope toward the situation in Colorado, one of the few states to legalize marijuana for recreational as well as medicinal use.

“I think we’re looking at a Pandora’s box here,” he said.

Jones said his personal research had turned up no “definitive statement” from a respected medical institution that medical marijuana is completely safe.

Jones was one of the few “no” votes in committee Monday.

Wilson said that does not mean the bill has an easy road. He said he would work to convince the House leadership to allow a floor vote on it, with a soft deadline for passage looming Friday.

Even if it does come up for a House vote, there’s no guarantee it would pass there.

Rep. Don Hill, a Republican from Emporia, said Monday he was voting for the bill in committee but was undecided on how he would vote if it came to the floor.

Hill said he would prefer to follow the U.S. Food and Drug Administration medication approval process, but he’s sympathetic to parents who don’t think they can wait because of their children’s persistent seizures.

“I’m not yet convinced that we have the evidence that we need to have to be certain of the safety as well as the therapeutic benefit — the risk-to-benefit profile,” said Hill, a retired pharmacist. “But I’m also not satisfied that over the last several years we — the federal government, the pharmaceutical industry and our FDA system — have moved as quickly as I would have hoped.”

The nonprofit KHI News Service is an editorially independent initiative of the Kansas Health Institute and a partner in the Heartland Health Monitor reporting collaboration. All stories and photos may be republished at no cost with proper attribution and a link back to KHI.org when a story is reposted online.


– See more at
http://www.khi.org/news/article/cannabis-oil-bill-passes-committee#sthash.biXero2h.dpuf

‘Next big thing has been here all along,’ mayor says in state of government address

Mayor Mark Holland delivered the state of the government address on Tuesday, Feb. 24, at the Reardon Convention Center, Kansas City, Kan. (Photo by William Crum)
Mayor Mark Holland delivered the state of the government address on Tuesday, Feb. 24, at the Reardon Convention Center, Kansas City, Kan. (Photo by William Crum)

by William Crum

In a speech highlighting economic development, civic innovation and improving health, Mayor Mark Holland today said the rest of the metro area has been watching Wyandotte County’s success in awe, and “the next big thing has been here all along.”

Holland today delivered his state of the government address to more than 350 people who attended a luncheon at the Reardon Convention Center in Kansas City, Kan.

This is the mayor’s second state of the government address. In his speech he spoke about countywide economic development, civic innovation and improving the health of Wyandotte County residents.

The mayor, who is also the CEO of the UG, specifically mentioned the new Dairy Farmers of America office building development, as well as luxury apartments and Schlitterbahn’s tallest waterslide in the world in the Village West area. He also noted there had been economic development in the 39th and Rainbow area, new businesses in Fairfax, new grocery stores in Argentine and Midtown, and reinvestment in downtown Kansas City, Kan.

“Wyandotte County is leading the state and the metro in job creation,” Mayor Holland said. “Our residents make up 5 percent of Kansas’ population, but we created 30 percent of new Kansas jobs in 2014; that number was 40 percent across the Greater Kansas City metropolitan area. The opportunities are here, and we need to make sure our citizens have access to these world-class jobs.”

“We are currently working on a strategic plan to decrease taxes and improve the services for our community,” Mayor Holland said. “We also are working with the school districts to increase educational opportunities within our community. We also need to take care of our employees in the UG government. We have done a lot over the last year.”

“A good example of this is the Dairy Farmers Association who is building brand new facilities in the western part of our community. In the downtown area we have a Healthy Cities campaign, where we will have a Healthy Campus located where the Big 11 Lake is. This is funded by both corporate and private donations.

“As of yet I have not spoken to former mayor and CEO of the Unified Government of Wyandotte County Joe Reardon regarding mass transit in our community but I plan to in the near future. Mayor Sly James of Kansas City, Mo., and I are working together with other mayors in the surrounding communities to increase jobs within the Greater Kansas City metropolitan area,” Mayor Holland said.

The mayor also praised the county’s history of inclusiveness and opportunity.

“Our strength lies in our residents, and the possibilities that are created here are a result of our diversity and tenacity,” Mayor Holland said. “The business community is realizing it and bringing their jobs here. The rest of metro has been watching our success in awe, but those of us who know Wyandotte County can tell you that the next big thing has been here all along.”

At the end of his speech Mayor Holland received a standing ovation for what he and the UG Commission have done for the community.

To watch the mayor’s speech on the UG’s website online, visit http://www.wycokck.org/InternetDept.aspx?id=18788&banner=15284&menu_id=1366.

Mayor Mark Holland received a standing ovation at the conclusion of his state of the government address on Tuesday, Feb. 24, at the Reardon Convention Center, Kansas City, Kan. (Photo by William Crum)
Mayor Mark Holland received a standing ovation at the conclusion of his state of the government address on Tuesday, Feb. 24, at the Reardon Convention Center, Kansas City, Kan. (Photo by William Crum)

Mayor Mark Holland spoke to the media after his state of the government address on Tuesday, Feb. 24, at the Reardon Convention Center, Kansas City, Kan. (Photo by William Crum)
Mayor Mark Holland spoke to the media after his state of the government address on Tuesday, Feb. 24, at the Reardon Convention Center, Kansas City, Kan. (Photo by William Crum)

Mayor Mark Holland (Photo by William Crum)
Mayor Mark Holland (Photo by William Crum)

Supreme Court finds Nebraska liable for ‘reckless’ water use

The U.S. Supreme Court today found Nebraska “recklessly” overused Republican River water in 2005 and 2006, and the court took the unprecedented step of ordering Nebraska to give up a portion of its unjust economic gains from keeping and using Kansas water, Attorney General Derek Schmidt said.

In a 28-page majority opinion, the court unanimously agreed that Nebraska “knowingly” violated the Republican River Compact and took water that belonged to Kansas.

As a remedy, the Supreme Court ordered by a 6-3 vote that Nebraska not only must pay Kansas’ actual damages from loss of water during those two dry years but also must “disgorge” a portion of the economic gain Nebraska received from higher yields from irrigating crops with water that should have been sent downstream to Kansas.

“Nebraska recklessly gambled with Kansas’s rights, consciously disregarding a substantial probability that its actions would deprive Kansas of the water to which it was entitled,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court’s majority. “That is nearly a recipe for breach [of the Compact that governs sharing of Republican River water]—for an upstream State to refuse to deliver to its downstream neighbor the water to which the latter is entitled. And through 2006, Nebraska took full advantage of its favorable position, eschewing steps that would effectively control groundwater pumping and thus exceeding its allotment. In such circumstances, a disgorgement award appropriately reminds Nebraska of its legal obligations, deters future violations, and promotes the Compact’s successful administration.”

Schmidt noted that the Supreme Court never before had ordered disgorgement of an upstream state’s unjust gains as a remedy in an interstate water dispute.

“Legally, this is a groundbreaking case that vindicates Kansas’s rights as a downstream state,” Schmidt said. “We brought this lawsuit to encourage our neighbors to live up to their obligations in future dry periods. I’m hopeful this strong and clear Supreme Court order will have that effect.”

The Supreme Court ordered Nebraska to repay Kansas $3.7 million to compensate for Kansas’s actual economic losses during 2005-2006 and another $1.8 million as partial disgorgement of Nebraska’s unjust gains from illegally using Kansas water, according to the attorney general’s office. That $5.5 million recovery will be used to fully reimburse the attorney general’s office for its roughly $4.5 million in bringing the lawsuit and defending Kansas water rights, making the state of Kansas whole for its cost of litigation. The remainder will be available to the legislature to designate for other purposes as provided by law.

The Supreme Court also ordered technical changes to the calculation of future water flows from the Platte River basin into the Republican River basin as requested by Nebraska. The decision to order that reformation of the accounting procedure was 5-4.